Advanced Search

Search Results (Searched for: cx-10)

  • goebish
  • goebish's Avatar
15 May 2015 10:29 - 15 May 2015 10:30
Replied by goebish on topic JD 395 cx-10

JD 395 cx-10

Category: Protocol Development

I'm making some progress , I'm fairly confident it's almost there :)
  • Durete
  • Durete's Avatar
15 May 2015 10:22
Replied by Durete on topic JD 395 cx-10

JD 395 cx-10

Category: Protocol Development

Come on guys! More captures :lol:
  • goebish
  • goebish's Avatar
15 May 2015 10:19
Replied by goebish on topic JD 395 cx-10

JD 395 cx-10

Category: Protocol Development

Thanks, added to the list (#3), it follows the pattern :)
  • Durete
  • Durete's Avatar
15 May 2015 10:15
Replied by Durete on topic JD 395 cx-10

JD 395 cx-10

Category: Protocol Development

Please, take a look. I think this time I finished the bind process.

www.dropbox.com/s/8xclcd675x4msxe/CX-10%20Green2.rar?dl=0
  • Durete
  • Durete's Avatar
15 May 2015 09:56
Replied by Durete on topic JD 395 cx-10

JD 395 cx-10

Category: Protocol Development

Ok, I will try something....
  • goebish
  • goebish's Avatar
15 May 2015 09:53 - 15 May 2015 10:55
Replied by goebish on topic JD 395 cx-10

JD 395 cx-10

Category: Protocol Development

Thanks, but no bind, no hopping sequence

(pas de bras, pas de chocolat :P)
  • Durete
  • Durete's Avatar
15 May 2015 09:50 - 15 May 2015 15:33
Replied by Durete on topic JD 395 cx-10

JD 395 cx-10

Category: Protocol Development

A new capture from my almost destroyed CX-10 green TX :evil:
I don't now if you can extract some valid info, because can't complete the bind process without the sticks :P



Removed capture
  • goebish
  • goebish's Avatar
15 May 2015 08:52 - 15 May 2015 11:16
Replied by goebish on topic JD 395 cx-10

JD 395 cx-10

Category: Protocol Development

This is what we have so far:
Seems only packet[1] and packet[2] has something to do with frequencies sequence,
TXID: E3 04 xx xx -> rf channels: 06 24 31 40 (cx-10 green pcb)
TXID: 0B 06 xx xx -> rf channels: 0E 16 33 40 (cx-10 green pcb)
TXID: FF 08 xx xx -> rf channels: 12 25 35 40 (cx-10 green pcb)
TXID: 87 10 xx xx -> rf channels: 0A 1E 2D 41 (don't remember)
TXID: 79 05 xx xx -> rf channels: 0C 1D 32 40 (JD 395)
TXID: EF 07 xx xx -> rf channels: 12 24 34 40 (cx-10 blue pcb, not exactly the same protocol but txid / channels seems to follow a similar pattern)

That's not enough for me to crack it, but a pattern is starting to emerge :)
rf channel 1 = (packet[1] & 0x0F) + 0x03
rf channel 2 = (packet[1] >> 4) + 0x16
rf channel 3 = (packet[2] & 0x0F) + 0x2D
rf channel 4 = (packet[2] >> 4) + 0x40

we may have to make captures on the RX side with more TXIDs on TX side.
  • Durete
  • Durete's Avatar
15 May 2015 07:29
Replied by Durete on topic JD 395 cx-10

JD 395 cx-10

Category: Protocol Development

I captured SPI traces from my JXD 395 TX to bring some help to full reversing protocol:

www.dropbox.com/s/v7xq8d6pywl1nmd/JXD395.rar?dl=0
  • Tryptych
  • Tryptych's Avatar
14 May 2015 01:58 - 14 May 2015 01:59
Replied by Tryptych on topic What's your favorite nano size quad for Deviation?

What's your favorite nano size quad for Deviation?

Category: General Discussions

I'm back... at this point I've tested 4 nano sized quads with Deviation:

- Proto X
- Proto X SLT
- Cheerson CX-10 (red)
- WLToys v272

I hope this helps someone and saves them the money I blew :)

At this point in time, very reluctantly, I have to say that the WLToys v272 is my favorite nano sized quad for Deviation, despite it's low yaw rate. The main reason I would recommend the 272 is the price. The yaw rate is a bit slow but it's the only drawback, otherwise it flies really well and does nice flips, and flight times are close to 5 minutes. My old Proto X only gets about 3 minutes. The new Proto X SLT would be the king as far as I'm concerned, despite costing more then twice the 272, but there is an issue with Deviation and the SLT protocol right now that is preventing it from claiming the throne. The Cheerson CX-10 is great too, but building a red pcb deviation compatible one yourself is a huge pain since the parts are so tiny - it's harder then you'd think to cram it all together and it will cost you at least 2x what a v272 will cost you, so it's eliminated too.

At $15 (BNF) there really is no competition for the v272: It is the king of the Deviation-Compatible Nano Sized Quads.
  • victzh
  • victzh's Avatar
11 May 2015 20:03
Replied by victzh on topic CX-10 green board experimental build

CX-10 green board experimental build

Category: Builds

goebish wrote: very interesting article: travisgoodspeed.blogspot.fr/2011/02/prom...-nrf24l01s-duty.html ... one more rss feed to follow.


Yeah, I know about Travis for a long time. He's an impressive guy. Check out Michael Ossmann, the author of HackRF and Ubertooth.
  • victzh
  • victzh's Avatar
11 May 2015 20:01
Replied by victzh on topic CX-10 green board experimental build

CX-10 green board experimental build

Category: Builds

I still have high hopes for ADF7242 - it's a chip which supports many data rates, flexible modulation (you can vary frequency deviation) and it supports direct mode - it gives you just a stream of bits (you can ask for preamble and address detection if you want) and you're free to process them. The reverse is also true - it will encode your bit stream as you wish, no limitation on packet structure.

It requires some extra handling, effectively you need provide all buffering and packet structure yourself, but is much more flexible.

Their eval boards are expensive - $100 for a bare chip and some passives on a small PCB, otherwise I'd have ordered it long ago.
  • goebish
  • goebish's Avatar
11 May 2015 18:03 - 11 May 2015 18:47
Replied by goebish on topic CX-10 green board experimental build

CX-10 green board experimental build

Category: Builds

I really need to invest in a HackRF ... But I also want a Taranis... I've to make an hard choice :)
Thanks camousse, I didn't know the nrf24 has promiscuity mode, if this is the case I understand how this would be possible.

Sorry victzh, I'm not impatient, just very curious, I've to understand how things work or I can't sleep at night ;)

edit:
very interesting article: travisgoodspeed.blogspot.fr/2011/02/prom...-nrf24l01s-duty.html ... one more rss feed to follow.
  • camousse
  • camousse's Avatar
11 May 2015 18:00
Replied by camousse on topic CX-10 green board experimental build

CX-10 green board experimental build

Category: Builds

Ok i understand what you mean. Preambule (one bytes that is sent before address is sent, to identify start of packet) is different from nrf24l01 to xn297. this means the nrf never identify the start of a new packet, so we never receive what we expect.
Some guys try to put the NRF24L01 in "promiscous mode" (as in ethernet, listen to packet without knowing the address). I already post the link in the jxd395 thread.
The basic idea is that. Packet are composed of preambule, address, and payload. For exemple, preambule is AA. By using a address on 2 bytes (the minimum), and setting the address to AA AA, nrf24l01 will misunderstand the start of the packet, and the payload will be the real address.
Ok i think about it, and it isn't usefull as preambule is different
  • victzh
  • victzh's Avatar
11 May 2015 17:23
Replied by victzh on topic CX-10 green board experimental build

CX-10 green board experimental build

Category: Builds

Patience... :-)
  • goebish
  • goebish's Avatar
11 May 2015 15:52
Replied by goebish on topic CX-10 green board experimental build

CX-10 green board experimental build

Category: Builds

^ That.

I understand how your TX code works, but I don't understand how it could work the other way'round if the nrf24l01 doesn't receive a valid preamble.
  • victzh
  • victzh's Avatar
11 May 2015 15:49
Replied by victzh on topic CX-10 green board experimental build

CX-10 green board experimental build

Category: Builds

The main problem is not changing the mode, it can be done through the power down as PB said (more slowly, but may be not critical). The problem is whether nRF24 or Beken can detect a valid packet on air, issued by XN297. It's not tested yet, and not implemented in the emulation layer.
  • camousse
  • camousse's Avatar
11 May 2015 10:22
Replied by camousse on topic CX-10 green board experimental build

CX-10 green board experimental build

Category: Builds

I analyse the blue board protocol on the past. And the tx have to receive the rx id to send good packet (only one).
The CE pin of the NRF24L01 is always high, so you can't change the mode (TX/RX of NRF24L01). But PB said it is possible by shutting it down, and restart it in RX mode. It take times (don"t remeber how much) but i think it can work
  • NoOneRuleZ
  • NoOneRuleZ's Avatar
11 May 2015 03:28
Replied by NoOneRuleZ on topic CX-10 green board experimental build

CX-10 green board experimental build

Category: Builds

Awesome work! :)

I'm brand new to the scene. I recently purchased a CX-10 but I didn't like the controller so I purchased a Devo 7E. Of course I'll buy more serious copters later but for now, this is a neat toy.
  • mbk17
  • mbk17's Avatar
11 May 2015 02:11
Replied by mbk17 on topic CX-10 green board experimental build

CX-10 green board experimental build

Category: Builds

victzh wrote: @Durete - it's as safe as any nightly build, your judgement here is as good as mine.

@magic_marty - it will, I just built it for the one I have (10) and another one that is critical with resources (7E) to check it compiles and works well with the module system. The module itself is not production quality yes, one thing is the protocol is not reversed fully yet and we can't support many CX-10 flying simultaneously. Another, I would like to implement "blue board" as well. It will take some time but it's gonna be soon.


I also have a blue board. I look forward to your work on that and it is much appreciated.
Displaying 481 - 500 out of 736 results.
Time to create page: 1.246 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum