- Posts: 1016
FlySky (1-way) new protocol variant
- SeByDocKy
-
Topic Author
- Offline
Less
More
22 Mar 2015 21:53 #30081
by SeByDocKy
Replied by SeByDocKy on topic FlySky (1-way) new protocol variant
I think the best option is to set max rates then play with our devo and D/R ...
- goebish
-
- Offline
- NRF Weirdo
Less
More
- Posts: 2633
22 Mar 2015 21:54 - 22 Mar 2015 22:08 #30082
by goebish
Replied by goebish on topic FlySky (1-way) new protocol variant
That's what I think too, I see the 4 rates in your last captures, all the captures in post #1 are in 40% rate, hence I haven't noticed those bits
Last edit: 22 Mar 2015 22:08 by goebish.
- goebish
-
- Offline
- NRF Weirdo
Less
More
- Posts: 2633
22 Mar 2015 23:37 - 22 Mar 2015 23:37 #30087
by goebish
Replied by goebish on topic FlySky (1-way) new protocol variant
SeByDocKy, if you ever get your hands on one of those things:
www.banggood.com/Eachine-3D-X4-2_4G-4CH-...ED-RTF-p-969112.html
let me know which RF chip it's using (XN297 I suppose?).
I want one of those micro 3D machines
www.banggood.com/Eachine-3D-X4-2_4G-4CH-...ED-RTF-p-969112.html
let me know which RF chip it's using (XN297 I suppose?).
I want one of those micro 3D machines
Last edit: 22 Mar 2015 23:37 by goebish.
- SeByDocKy
-
Topic Author
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 1016
23 Mar 2015 05:27 #30095
by SeByDocKy
I should & hope review it ...
Replied by SeByDocKy on topic FlySky (1-way) new protocol variant
goebish wrote: SeByDocKy, if you ever get your hands on one of those things:
www.banggood.com/Eachine-3D-X4-2_4G-4CH-...ED-RTF-p-969112.html
let me know which RF chip it's using (XN297 I suppose?).
I want one of those micro 3D machines
I should & hope review it ...
- goebish
-
- Offline
- NRF Weirdo
Less
More
- Posts: 2633
23 Mar 2015 12:05 #30103
by goebish
Replied by goebish on topic FlySky (1-way) new protocol variant
I had a -$6 BG coupon and pre-ordered it, I'm weak ...
- SeByDocKy
-
Topic Author
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 1016
23 Mar 2015 13:13 #30104
by SeByDocKy
Order also a "M7 wide lens" or the 808 #16 lens D ...
Replied by SeByDocKy on topic FlySky (1-way) new protocol variant
goebish wrote: I had a -$6 BG coupon and pre-ordered it, I'm weak ...
Order also a "M7 wide lens" or the 808 #16 lens D ...
- goebish
-
- Offline
- NRF Weirdo
Less
More
- Posts: 2633
23 Mar 2015 13:43 #30108
by goebish
Replied by goebish on topic FlySky (1-way) new protocol variant
No, I pre-ordered the Eachine 3D X4, not the v686, I've no interest in buying another toy grade machine for which the protocol has already been reversed 
On your V686 TX, can you make a capture of the X-axis and Y-axis calibration key (I guess you've to push 40% and 60% buttons for more than 3 seconds), if you don't want to mess with your actual settings, I think you can press the buttons without having the TX bound to the copter as it's a 1 way protocol.
I think this is the only thing we're missing for the V6x6 protocol.
On your V686 TX, can you make a capture of the X-axis and Y-axis calibration key (I guess you've to push 40% and 60% buttons for more than 3 seconds), if you don't want to mess with your actual settings, I think you can press the buttons without having the TX bound to the copter as it's a 1 way protocol.
I think this is the only thing we're missing for the V6x6 protocol.
- SeByDocKy
-
Topic Author
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 1016
23 Mar 2015 14:08 #30110
by SeByDocKy
Replied by SeByDocKy on topic FlySky (1-way) new protocol variant
In the list of XN297 models, you have the DM007, JJRC H9D,
- victzh
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 1386
27 Mar 2015 02:53 #30312
by victzh
Replied by victzh on topic FlySky (1-way) new protocol variant
You guys are seducers. They should pay you for the advertisement
(I bought it).
I spent several days trying to make sense out of GNU Radio analyzing what's wrong with these nRF24L01+ clones and why we can't control these models with regular nRF24. Not so successful so far
I spent several days trying to make sense out of GNU Radio analyzing what's wrong with these nRF24L01+ clones and why we can't control these models with regular nRF24. Not so successful so far
- SeByDocKy
-
Topic Author
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 1016
27 Mar 2015 09:52 #30324
by SeByDocKy
bad news .... Why not contact the associated compagny directly ?
Replied by SeByDocKy on topic FlySky (1-way) new protocol variant
victzh wrote: You guys are seducers. They should pay you for the advertisement
(I bought it).
I spent several days trying to make sense out of GNU Radio analyzing what's wrong with these nRF24L01+ clones and why we can't control these models with regular nRF24. Not so successful so far
Time to create page: 1.613 seconds
-
Home
-
Forum
-
Development
-
Protocol Development
- FlySky (1-way) new protocol variant