C-17 Transport

More
21 Apr 2019 15:08 #74070 by goebish
Replied by goebish on topic C-17 Transport
Can you retry with smaller (5) Fine-Freq steps please ?
Set Deviation to 0.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
21 Apr 2019 15:33 #74071 by Fer
Replied by Fer on topic C-17 Transport

goebish wrote: Can you retry with smaller (5) Fine-Freq steps please ?
Set Deviation to 0.[/quote

With the already installed firmware i assume. Ok, going to test in a while and will report back soon.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
21 Apr 2019 15:35 #74072 by goebish
Replied by goebish on topic C-17 Transport
Yes, dc59 got the V911S working only with a narrow range, so maybe you missed it with +/-50 steps.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
21 Apr 2019 15:56 #74073 by Fer
Replied by Fer on topic C-17 Transport

goebish wrote: Yes, dc59 got the V911S working only with a narrow range, so maybe you missed it with +/-50 steps.


Didn't bind with step of 5 either. Should i check one-by-one? Is that how norrow dc59 had to go to get V911S to bind (which is great news by the way).

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
21 Apr 2019 15:59 #74074 by goebish
Replied by goebish on topic C-17 Transport
That's not necessary, running out of ideas for now, I'll get back to you when I have something else to try.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
28 May 2019 20:09 #74417 by Fer
Replied by Fer on topic C-17 Transport
Is there any new info about this little plane? Has there been any progress?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
28 May 2019 20:44 #74418 by goebish
Replied by goebish on topic C-17 Transport
Nothing new, Pascal will make some tests with cc2500 since he has a stock Tx/Rx but he's busy right now.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
11 Jun 2019 05:07 #74498 by tianma780
Replied by tianma780 on topic C-17 Transport
Hello,goebish
I have bought the c-17 RX for test,and found that the c-17 rx have two versions

The GD00X protocol for now can bind the old RX,it name “GD9001-RX”

but can not bind the new version ,it name“gd9001-102rx2”or“gd005”

Can you send me a test build for V2,my transmitter is 7E 256 ,thank you!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
11 Jun 2019 08:26 #74501 by goebish
Replied by goebish on topic C-17 Transport
I made 2 versions for 7e-256, with GD00X for nrf24 and cc2500, let me know if one of them is working.
(select GD00X protocol with V2 format option)
www.dropbox.com/sh/s0xbf68hkfl5qni/AACNd...HdeIXBiQEXdF5Va?dl=0

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
11 Jun 2019 09:42 #74502 by tianma780
Replied by tianma780 on topic C-17 Transport
ok,I will test it tonight ,thank you goebish!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
11 Jun 2019 10:52 - 11 Jun 2019 10:56 #74504 by tianma780
Replied by tianma780 on topic C-17 Transport
Good news!

The nrf GD00X v2 can bind,but the cc2500 GD00X can not bind anyset!

Thank you Goebish,you are a great man!hah

By the way ,the nrf test build miss the e010(cc2500) protocol!
Last edit: 11 Jun 2019 10:56 by tianma780.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
11 Jun 2019 10:55 #74505 by goebish
Replied by goebish on topic C-17 Transport
Ok thanks, I'll only merge the nrf24 version for now.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
11 Jun 2019 11:01 - 11 Jun 2019 11:03 #74506 by tianma780
Replied by tianma780 on topic C-17 Transport
why the cc2500 GD00X can not bind?I like the fine-turn.
Last edit: 11 Jun 2019 11:03 by tianma780.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
11 Jun 2019 11:19 #74507 by planger
Replied by planger on topic C-17 Transport
I'm puzzled because my implementation on Multi of the GD00x v2 with the cc2500 works. On 1 of my module which was not working fine with the NFR it works with the CC2500. All other 4 modules are ok with both.
So this is a mistery, could you just have a mistake in your code? I could do a code review if you want.
Pascal

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
11 Jun 2019 11:24 - 11 Jun 2019 11:25 #74508 by goebish
Replied by goebish on topic C-17 Transport
Nothing special, I use the same emulation layer as for the E010 but perhaps I made a mistake porting your V2 code ?

github.com/DeviationTX/deviation/pull/860
github.com/goebish/deviation/blob/cc2500...tocol/gd00x_cc2500.c
Last edit: 11 Jun 2019 11:25 by goebish.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
11 Jun 2019 13:27 - 11 Jun 2019 13:30 #74509 by tianma780
Replied by tianma780 on topic C-17 Transport
hello goebish
There is the test report:
1.NRF24 GD00X
C-17 v1 RX and zc-z50 RX can bind and work well use GD00X V1 protocol ;
C-17 v2 RX use GD00X V2 protocol can bind,but the speed of Motor 1 and
Motor2 is not the same,I don't know how to say in english!

2.CC2500 GD00X

C-17 v1 RX and zc-z50 RX can not bind with v1 or v2 GD00X protocol;
C-17 v2 RX can not bind with v2 GD00X protocol;

I can send the v2 rx pcb for you to test .
Last edit: 11 Jun 2019 13:30 by tianma780.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
11 Jun 2019 20:00 #74510 by jejeg
Replied by jejeg on topic C-17 Transport
Hello . still no solution for 3-in-1 modules?
Walk very well with the 4in1 on devo12s but not on my devo7e with 3in1.
Jérôme

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
02 Jul 2019 16:41 #74639 by tianma780
Replied by tianma780 on topic C-17 Transport
hello goebish,Can you share the gd00x_nrf24l01.c file with v1&v2 to me,I want to try to edit it in docker ,thank you!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
02 Jul 2019 16:47 #74640 by goebish
Replied by goebish on topic C-17 Transport
source file here: github.com/goebish/deviation/blob/protoc...col/gd00x_nrf24l01.c

branch: github.com/goebish/deviation/tree/protocol_gd00x_v2

but I'm not sure it works, according to Pascal it's working perfectly with cc2500 on multi protocol module, I probably made a mistake, I'll restart from scratch and post a new test build when I have a chance, but time is lacking right now ;)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
02 Jul 2019 17:16 - 03 Jul 2019 07:29 #74641 by tianma780
Replied by tianma780 on topic C-17 Transport
Thank you so much.
The protocol gd00x v1 fly my zc-z50 have some problem,
and I change
"u16 channel=scale_channel(CHANNEL1, 2000, 1000); // aileron
packet[5 ] = channel;
packet[6 ] = channel>>8;
channel=scale_channel(CHANNEL3, 1000, 2000); // throttle
packet[7 ] = channel;
packet[8 ] = channel>>8;
// dynamically driven aileron trim
channel=scale_channel(CHANNEL1, 1000, 2000); // aileron"
to
"u16 channel=scale_channel(CHANNEL1, 1000, 2000); // aileron
packet[5 ] = channel;
packet[6 ] = channel>>8;
channel=scale_channel(CHANNEL3, 1000, 2000); // throttle
packet[7 ] = channel;
packet[8 ] = channel>>8;
// dynamically driven aileron trim
channel=scale_channel(CHANNEL1, 1000, 2000); // aileron"

then reverse aileron and it work well now!
Last edit: 03 Jul 2019 07:29 by tianma780.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.078 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum