- Posts: 2633
C-17 Transport
- goebish
-
- Offline
- NRF Weirdo
Less
More
21 Apr 2019 15:08 #74070
by goebish
Replied by goebish on topic C-17 Transport
Can you retry with smaller (5) Fine-Freq steps please ?
Set Deviation to 0.
Set Deviation to 0.
- Fer
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 203
21 Apr 2019 15:33 #74071
by Fer
Replied by Fer on topic C-17 Transport
goebish wrote: Can you retry with smaller (5) Fine-Freq steps please ?
Set Deviation to 0.[/quote
With the already installed firmware i assume. Ok, going to test in a while and will report back soon.
- goebish
-
- Offline
- NRF Weirdo
Less
More
- Posts: 2633
21 Apr 2019 15:35 #74072
by goebish
Replied by goebish on topic C-17 Transport
Yes, dc59 got the V911S working only with a narrow range, so maybe you missed it with +/-50 steps.
- Fer
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 203
21 Apr 2019 15:56 #74073
by Fer
Didn't bind with step of 5 either. Should i check one-by-one? Is that how norrow dc59 had to go to get V911S to bind (which is great news by the way).
Replied by Fer on topic C-17 Transport
goebish wrote: Yes, dc59 got the V911S working only with a narrow range, so maybe you missed it with +/-50 steps.
Didn't bind with step of 5 either. Should i check one-by-one? Is that how norrow dc59 had to go to get V911S to bind (which is great news by the way).
- goebish
-
- Offline
- NRF Weirdo
Less
More
- Posts: 2633
21 Apr 2019 15:59 #74074
by goebish
Replied by goebish on topic C-17 Transport
That's not necessary, running out of ideas for now, I'll get back to you when I have something else to try.
- Fer
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 203
28 May 2019 20:09 #74417
by Fer
Replied by Fer on topic C-17 Transport
Is there any new info about this little plane? Has there been any progress?
- goebish
-
- Offline
- NRF Weirdo
Less
More
- Posts: 2633
28 May 2019 20:44 #74418
by goebish
Replied by goebish on topic C-17 Transport
Nothing new, Pascal will make some tests with cc2500 since he has a stock Tx/Rx but he's busy right now.
- tianma780
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 54
11 Jun 2019 05:07 #74498
by tianma780
Replied by tianma780 on topic C-17 Transport
Hello,goebish
I have bought the c-17 RX for test,and found that the c-17 rx have two versions
The GD00X protocol for now can bind the old RX,it name “GD9001-RX”
but can not bind the new version ,it name“gd9001-102rx2”or“gd005”
Can you send me a test build for V2,my transmitter is 7E 256 ,thank you!
I have bought the c-17 RX for test,and found that the c-17 rx have two versions
The GD00X protocol for now can bind the old RX,it name “GD9001-RX”
but can not bind the new version ,it name“gd9001-102rx2”or“gd005”
Can you send me a test build for V2,my transmitter is 7E 256 ,thank you!
- goebish
-
- Offline
- NRF Weirdo
Less
More
- Posts: 2633
11 Jun 2019 08:26 #74501
by goebish
Replied by goebish on topic C-17 Transport
I made 2 versions for 7e-256, with GD00X for nrf24 and cc2500, let me know if one of them is working.
(select GD00X protocol with V2 format option)
www.dropbox.com/sh/s0xbf68hkfl5qni/AACNd...HdeIXBiQEXdF5Va?dl=0
(select GD00X protocol with V2 format option)
www.dropbox.com/sh/s0xbf68hkfl5qni/AACNd...HdeIXBiQEXdF5Va?dl=0
- tianma780
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 54
11 Jun 2019 09:42 #74502
by tianma780
Replied by tianma780 on topic C-17 Transport
ok,I will test it tonight ,thank you goebish!
- tianma780
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 54
11 Jun 2019 10:52 - 11 Jun 2019 10:56 #74504
by tianma780
Replied by tianma780 on topic C-17 Transport
Good news!
The nrf GD00X v2 can bind,but the cc2500 GD00X can not bind anyset!
Thank you Goebish,you are a great man!hah
By the way ,the nrf test build miss the e010(cc2500) protocol!
The nrf GD00X v2 can bind,but the cc2500 GD00X can not bind anyset!
Thank you Goebish,you are a great man!hah
By the way ,the nrf test build miss the e010(cc2500) protocol!
Last edit: 11 Jun 2019 10:56 by tianma780.
- goebish
-
- Offline
- NRF Weirdo
Less
More
- Posts: 2633
11 Jun 2019 10:55 #74505
by goebish
Replied by goebish on topic C-17 Transport
Ok thanks, I'll only merge the nrf24 version for now.
- tianma780
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 54
11 Jun 2019 11:01 - 11 Jun 2019 11:03 #74506
by tianma780
Replied by tianma780 on topic C-17 Transport
why the cc2500 GD00X can not bind?I like the fine-turn.
Last edit: 11 Jun 2019 11:03 by tianma780.
- planger
-
Topic Author
- Offline
11 Jun 2019 11:19 #74507
by planger
Replied by planger on topic C-17 Transport
I'm puzzled because my implementation on Multi of the GD00x v2 with the cc2500 works. On 1 of my module which was not working fine with the NFR it works with the CC2500. All other 4 modules are ok with both.
So this is a mistery, could you just have a mistake in your code? I could do a code review if you want.
Pascal
So this is a mistery, could you just have a mistake in your code? I could do a code review if you want.
Pascal
- goebish
-
- Offline
- NRF Weirdo
Less
More
- Posts: 2633
11 Jun 2019 11:24 - 11 Jun 2019 11:25 #74508
by goebish
Replied by goebish on topic C-17 Transport
Nothing special, I use the same emulation layer as for the E010 but perhaps I made a mistake porting your V2 code ?
github.com/DeviationTX/deviation/pull/860
github.com/goebish/deviation/blob/cc2500...tocol/gd00x_cc2500.c
github.com/DeviationTX/deviation/pull/860
github.com/goebish/deviation/blob/cc2500...tocol/gd00x_cc2500.c
Last edit: 11 Jun 2019 11:25 by goebish.
- tianma780
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 54
11 Jun 2019 13:27 - 11 Jun 2019 13:30 #74509
by tianma780
Replied by tianma780 on topic C-17 Transport
hello goebish
There is the test report:
1.NRF24 GD00X
C-17 v1 RX and zc-z50 RX can bind and work well use GD00X V1 protocol ;
C-17 v2 RX use GD00X V2 protocol can bind,but the speed of Motor 1 and
Motor2 is not the same,I don't know how to say in english!
2.CC2500 GD00X
C-17 v1 RX and zc-z50 RX can not bind with v1 or v2 GD00X protocol;
C-17 v2 RX can not bind with v2 GD00X protocol;
I can send the v2 rx pcb for you to test .
There is the test report:
1.NRF24 GD00X
C-17 v1 RX and zc-z50 RX can bind and work well use GD00X V1 protocol ;
C-17 v2 RX use GD00X V2 protocol can bind,but the speed of Motor 1 and
Motor2 is not the same,I don't know how to say in english!
2.CC2500 GD00X
C-17 v1 RX and zc-z50 RX can not bind with v1 or v2 GD00X protocol;
C-17 v2 RX can not bind with v2 GD00X protocol;
I can send the v2 rx pcb for you to test .
Last edit: 11 Jun 2019 13:30 by tianma780.
- jejeg
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 143
11 Jun 2019 20:00 #74510
by jejeg
Replied by jejeg on topic C-17 Transport
Hello . still no solution for 3-in-1 modules?
Walk very well with the 4in1 on devo12s but not on my devo7e with 3in1.
Jérôme
Walk very well with the 4in1 on devo12s but not on my devo7e with 3in1.
Jérôme
- tianma780
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 54
02 Jul 2019 16:41 #74639
by tianma780
Replied by tianma780 on topic C-17 Transport
hello goebish,Can you share the gd00x_nrf24l01.c file with v1&v2 to me,I want to try to edit it in docker ,thank you!
- goebish
-
- Offline
- NRF Weirdo
Less
More
- Posts: 2633
02 Jul 2019 16:47 #74640
by goebish
Replied by goebish on topic C-17 Transport
source file here:
github.com/goebish/deviation/blob/protoc...col/gd00x_nrf24l01.c
branch: github.com/goebish/deviation/tree/protocol_gd00x_v2
but I'm not sure it works, according to Pascal it's working perfectly with cc2500 on multi protocol module, I probably made a mistake, I'll restart from scratch and post a new test build when I have a chance, but time is lacking right now
branch: github.com/goebish/deviation/tree/protocol_gd00x_v2
but I'm not sure it works, according to Pascal it's working perfectly with cc2500 on multi protocol module, I probably made a mistake, I'll restart from scratch and post a new test build when I have a chance, but time is lacking right now
- tianma780
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 54
02 Jul 2019 17:16 - 03 Jul 2019 07:29 #74641
by tianma780
Replied by tianma780 on topic C-17 Transport
Thank you so much.
The protocol gd00x v1 fly my zc-z50 have some problem,
and I change
"u16 channel=scale_channel(CHANNEL1, 2000, 1000); // aileron
packet[5 ] = channel;
packet[6 ] = channel>>8;
channel=scale_channel(CHANNEL3, 1000, 2000); // throttle
packet[7 ] = channel;
packet[8 ] = channel>>8;
// dynamically driven aileron trim
channel=scale_channel(CHANNEL1, 1000, 2000); // aileron"
to
"u16 channel=scale_channel(CHANNEL1, 1000, 2000); // aileron
packet[5 ] = channel;
packet[6 ] = channel>>8;
channel=scale_channel(CHANNEL3, 1000, 2000); // throttle
packet[7 ] = channel;
packet[8 ] = channel>>8;
// dynamically driven aileron trim
channel=scale_channel(CHANNEL1, 1000, 2000); // aileron"
then reverse aileron and it work well now!
The protocol gd00x v1 fly my zc-z50 have some problem,
and I change
"u16 channel=scale_channel(CHANNEL1, 2000, 1000); // aileron
packet[5 ] = channel;
packet[6 ] = channel>>8;
channel=scale_channel(CHANNEL3, 1000, 2000); // throttle
packet[7 ] = channel;
packet[8 ] = channel>>8;
// dynamically driven aileron trim
channel=scale_channel(CHANNEL1, 1000, 2000); // aileron"
to
"u16 channel=scale_channel(CHANNEL1, 1000, 2000); // aileron
packet[5 ] = channel;
packet[6 ] = channel>>8;
channel=scale_channel(CHANNEL3, 1000, 2000); // throttle
packet[7 ] = channel;
packet[8 ] = channel>>8;
// dynamically driven aileron trim
channel=scale_channel(CHANNEL1, 1000, 2000); // aileron"
then reverse aileron and it work well now!
Last edit: 03 Jul 2019 07:29 by tianma780.
Time to create page: 0.100 seconds
-
Home
-
Forum
-
Development
-
Protocol Development
- C-17 Transport