×

Notice

The forum is in read only mode.

C-17 Transport

More
21 Apr 2019 15:08 #74070 by goebish
Replied by goebish on topic C-17 Transport
Can you retry with smaller (5) Fine-Freq steps please ?
Set Deviation to 0.
More
21 Apr 2019 15:33 #74071 by Fer
Replied by Fer on topic C-17 Transport

goebish wrote: Can you retry with smaller (5) Fine-Freq steps please ?
Set Deviation to 0.[/quote

With the already installed firmware i assume. Ok, going to test in a while and will report back soon.

More
21 Apr 2019 15:35 #74072 by goebish
Replied by goebish on topic C-17 Transport
Yes, dc59 got the V911S working only with a narrow range, so maybe you missed it with +/-50 steps.
More
21 Apr 2019 15:56 #74073 by Fer
Replied by Fer on topic C-17 Transport

goebish wrote: Yes, dc59 got the V911S working only with a narrow range, so maybe you missed it with +/-50 steps.


Didn't bind with step of 5 either. Should i check one-by-one? Is that how norrow dc59 had to go to get V911S to bind (which is great news by the way).
More
21 Apr 2019 15:59 #74074 by goebish
Replied by goebish on topic C-17 Transport
That's not necessary, running out of ideas for now, I'll get back to you when I have something else to try.
More
28 May 2019 20:09 #74417 by Fer
Replied by Fer on topic C-17 Transport
Is there any new info about this little plane? Has there been any progress?
More
28 May 2019 20:44 #74418 by goebish
Replied by goebish on topic C-17 Transport
Nothing new, Pascal will make some tests with cc2500 since he has a stock Tx/Rx but he's busy right now.
More
11 Jun 2019 05:07 #74498 by tianma780
Replied by tianma780 on topic C-17 Transport
Hello,goebish
I have bought the c-17 RX for test,and found that the c-17 rx have two versions

The GD00X protocol for now can bind the old RX,it name “GD9001-RX”

but can not bind the new version ,it name“gd9001-102rx2”or“gd005”

Can you send me a test build for V2,my transmitter is 7E 256 ,thank you!
More
11 Jun 2019 08:26 #74501 by goebish
Replied by goebish on topic C-17 Transport
I made 2 versions for 7e-256, with GD00X for nrf24 and cc2500, let me know if one of them is working.
(select GD00X protocol with V2 format option)
www.dropbox.com/sh/s0xbf68hkfl5qni/AACNd...HdeIXBiQEXdF5Va?dl=0
More
11 Jun 2019 09:42 #74502 by tianma780
Replied by tianma780 on topic C-17 Transport
ok,I will test it tonight ,thank you goebish!
More
11 Jun 2019 10:52 - 11 Jun 2019 10:56 #74504 by tianma780
Replied by tianma780 on topic C-17 Transport
Good news!

The nrf GD00X v2 can bind,but the cc2500 GD00X can not bind anyset!

Thank you Goebish,you are a great man!hah

By the way ,the nrf test build miss the e010(cc2500) protocol!
Last edit: 11 Jun 2019 10:56 by tianma780.
More
11 Jun 2019 10:55 #74505 by goebish
Replied by goebish on topic C-17 Transport
Ok thanks, I'll only merge the nrf24 version for now.
More
11 Jun 2019 11:01 - 11 Jun 2019 11:03 #74506 by tianma780
Replied by tianma780 on topic C-17 Transport
why the cc2500 GD00X can not bind?I like the fine-turn.
Last edit: 11 Jun 2019 11:03 by tianma780.
More
11 Jun 2019 11:19 #74507 by planger
Replied by planger on topic C-17 Transport
I'm puzzled because my implementation on Multi of the GD00x v2 with the cc2500 works. On 1 of my module which was not working fine with the NFR it works with the CC2500. All other 4 modules are ok with both.
So this is a mistery, could you just have a mistake in your code? I could do a code review if you want.
Pascal
More
11 Jun 2019 11:24 - 11 Jun 2019 11:25 #74508 by goebish
Replied by goebish on topic C-17 Transport
Nothing special, I use the same emulation layer as for the E010 but perhaps I made a mistake porting your V2 code ?

github.com/DeviationTX/deviation/pull/860
github.com/goebish/deviation/blob/cc2500...tocol/gd00x_cc2500.c
Last edit: 11 Jun 2019 11:25 by goebish.
More
11 Jun 2019 13:27 - 11 Jun 2019 13:30 #74509 by tianma780
Replied by tianma780 on topic C-17 Transport
hello goebish
There is the test report:
1.NRF24 GD00X
C-17 v1 RX and zc-z50 RX can bind and work well use GD00X V1 protocol ;
C-17 v2 RX use GD00X V2 protocol can bind,but the speed of Motor 1 and
Motor2 is not the same,I don't know how to say in english!

2.CC2500 GD00X

C-17 v1 RX and zc-z50 RX can not bind with v1 or v2 GD00X protocol;
C-17 v2 RX can not bind with v2 GD00X protocol;

I can send the v2 rx pcb for you to test .
Last edit: 11 Jun 2019 13:30 by tianma780.
More
11 Jun 2019 20:00 #74510 by jejeg
Replied by jejeg on topic C-17 Transport
Hello . still no solution for 3-in-1 modules?
Walk very well with the 4in1 on devo12s but not on my devo7e with 3in1.
Jérôme
More
02 Jul 2019 16:41 #74639 by tianma780
Replied by tianma780 on topic C-17 Transport
hello goebish,Can you share the gd00x_nrf24l01.c file with v1&v2 to me,I want to try to edit it in docker ,thank you!
More
02 Jul 2019 16:47 #74640 by goebish
Replied by goebish on topic C-17 Transport
source file here: github.com/goebish/deviation/blob/protoc...col/gd00x_nrf24l01.c

branch: github.com/goebish/deviation/tree/protocol_gd00x_v2

but I'm not sure it works, according to Pascal it's working perfectly with cc2500 on multi protocol module, I probably made a mistake, I'll restart from scratch and post a new test build when I have a chance, but time is lacking right now ;)
More
02 Jul 2019 17:16 - 03 Jul 2019 07:29 #74641 by tianma780
Replied by tianma780 on topic C-17 Transport
Thank you so much.
The protocol gd00x v1 fly my zc-z50 have some problem,
and I change
"u16 channel=scale_channel(CHANNEL1, 2000, 1000); // aileron
packet[5 ] = channel;
packet[6 ] = channel>>8;
channel=scale_channel(CHANNEL3, 1000, 2000); // throttle
packet[7 ] = channel;
packet[8 ] = channel>>8;
// dynamically driven aileron trim
channel=scale_channel(CHANNEL1, 1000, 2000); // aileron"
to
"u16 channel=scale_channel(CHANNEL1, 1000, 2000); // aileron
packet[5 ] = channel;
packet[6 ] = channel>>8;
channel=scale_channel(CHANNEL3, 1000, 2000); // throttle
packet[7 ] = channel;
packet[8 ] = channel>>8;
// dynamically driven aileron trim
channel=scale_channel(CHANNEL1, 1000, 2000); // aileron"

then reverse aileron and it work well now!
Last edit: 03 Jul 2019 07:29 by tianma780.
Time to create page: 0.100 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum