- Posts: 3
Bind Protocol and model list or database
- darowden
-
Topic Author
- Offline
Less
More
11 Feb 2014 18:38 - 11 Feb 2014 18:52 #20139
by darowden
Bind Protocol and model list or database was created by darowden
Does anyone know of a list or database on the forum of what RTF and/or BNF heli brands/Models use what bind protocols?
I did a search but came up with nothing.
Thanks
I did a search but came up with nothing.
Thanks
Last edit: 11 Feb 2014 18:52 by darowden.
- darowden
-
Topic Author
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 3
11 Feb 2014 18:58 - 13 Feb 2014 15:12 #20143
by darowden
Replied by darowden on topic Bind Protocol and model list or database
Thank you sir
Here is the list I have compiled so far.
Please feel free to point out errors or needed additions.
DISCLAIMER:
THE INFORMATION REPRESENTED IN THIS POST IS PURELY ANECDOTAL AND GATHERED FROM VARIOUS FORUMS AND SOURCES AND IS NOT GUARANTEED TO BE CORRECT. USE ONLY AT YOUR OWN RISK.
updated 2/13/2014
Here is the list I have compiled so far.
Please feel free to point out errors or needed additions.
DISCLAIMER:
THE INFORMATION REPRESENTED IN THIS POST IS PURELY ANECDOTAL AND GATHERED FROM VARIOUS FORUMS AND SOURCES AND IS NOT GUARANTEED TO BE CORRECT. USE ONLY AT YOUR OWN RISK.
updated 2/13/2014
Last edit: 13 Feb 2014 15:12 by darowden.
- PhracturedBlue
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 4403
18 Feb 2014 19:32 - 18 Feb 2014 19:32 #20538
by PhracturedBlue
Replied by PhracturedBlue on topic Bind Protocol and model list or database
I've started migrating your list to a google-docs spreadsheet here:
docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Any...VTlBzTkE&usp=sharing
If anyone wants to update it, just IM me your email address and I'll add edit permissions.
I've added this table to the menu at the left, and removed the Corresponding article.
docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Any...VTlBzTkE&usp=sharing
If anyone wants to update it, just IM me your email address and I'll add edit permissions.
I've added this table to the menu at the left, and removed the Corresponding article.
Last edit: 18 Feb 2014 19:32 by PhracturedBlue.
- darowden
-
Topic Author
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 3
18 Feb 2014 22:07 - 18 Feb 2014 22:08 #20544
by darowden
Excellent idea!
Replied by darowden on topic Bind Protocol and model list or database
PhracturedBlue wrote: I've started migrating your list to a google-docs spreadsheet here:
docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Any...VTlBzTkE&usp=sharing
If anyone wants to update it, just IM me your email address and I'll add edit permissions.
I've added this table to the menu at the left, and removed the Corresponding article.
Excellent idea!
Last edit: 18 Feb 2014 22:08 by darowden.
- PhracturedBlue
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 4403
18 Feb 2014 22:17 #20549
by PhracturedBlue
Replied by PhracturedBlue on topic Bind Protocol and model list or database
I went through all the model files posted on the forum, and extracted the model name and protocol. I then went and added these to the spreadsheet where I was (mostly) confident that they were right/unique. I'm not sure that there is value in adding every Walkera or Blade model, but I was thinking of creating links to the main Deviation thread for each, in which case I guess any model which has a thread is fair game (as long as the Rx can be well identified)
I'm not sure this will hold up, but lets see how it goes.
Note that the 2nd tab will have more detail about each protocol
I'm not sure this will hold up, but lets see how it goes.
Note that the 2nd tab will have more detail about each protocol
- mono
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 26
19 Feb 2014 01:39 - 19 Feb 2014 03:57 #20557
by mono
Replied by mono on topic Bind Protocol and model list or database
Just an F.Y.I regarding some of the HiSky micros.
HiSky have released variants of those models which now use FlySky protocol and they may be using the "FS" at the end to denote those versions.
I have no further details on it, just aware of them being released already.
Update. Did a bit of digging around, found so far that it's two of the fixed pitch flybarless models that have been released as FlySky compatible BNF's...
HFP100FS
HFP80FS
The HiSky compatible versions of their current range do not have "FS" in the model name.
HiSky have released variants of those models which now use FlySky protocol and they may be using the "FS" at the end to denote those versions.
I have no further details on it, just aware of them being released already.
Update. Did a bit of digging around, found so far that it's two of the fixed pitch flybarless models that have been released as FlySky compatible BNF's...
HFP100FS
HFP80FS
The HiSky compatible versions of their current range do not have "FS" in the model name.
Last edit: 19 Feb 2014 03:57 by mono.
- IMback!
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 84
20 Feb 2014 19:41 - 20 Feb 2014 19:41 #20661
by IMback!
Replied by IMback! on topic Bind Protocol and model list or database
Yes jameschen said that FS would mean flysky but so far only fp birds have FS variants so the sheet is wrong i think
Last edit: 20 Feb 2014 19:41 by IMback!.
- victzh
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 1386
21 Feb 2014 19:13 #20712
by victzh
Replied by victzh on topic Bind Protocol and model list or database
I can not edit the document, but in my opinion clones or rebadges of HiSky HCP HFP HMX series can be compressed:
HFP80 - former FBL70, WL-Toys V955
HFP100 - former FBL90, WL-Toys V944
HCP80 - former FBL80, WL-Toys V933
HCP100 - former FBL100, WL-Toys V922
HMX120 - former FF120, Q-BOT micro
Also, line 22 contains mystical Quad FBL100. May be it's unfortunate edit.
HFP80 - former FBL70, WL-Toys V955
HFP100 - former FBL90, WL-Toys V944
HCP80 - former FBL80, WL-Toys V933
HCP100 - former FBL100, WL-Toys V922
HMX120 - former FF120, Q-BOT micro
Also, line 22 contains mystical Quad FBL100. May be it's unfortunate edit.
- PhracturedBlue
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 4403
21 Feb 2014 19:32 #20713
by PhracturedBlue
Replied by PhracturedBlue on topic Bind Protocol and model list or database
I made the relevant notes. I've decided not to remove the duplicates. It makes it harder to do a reverse lookup (I have heli 'x' when protocol does it use). In the future, I may collapse all the Hisky models to one, and leave the WLtoys and other manufacturers, but for the moment, having a complete set with relevant comments should be sufficient.
- victzh
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 1386
21 Feb 2014 19:53 #20714
by victzh
Replied by victzh on topic Bind Protocol and model list or database
Looks great, thanks!
- mono
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 26
22 Feb 2014 14:48 #20740
by mono
Replied by mono on topic Bind Protocol and model list or database
Further to my earlier post, some more possible changes/additions to the chart.
The "FS" variants of the two HiSky models have been on sale for the last few weeks in the U.S. at this site...
www.massiverc.com/PrestaShop/en/208-hisk...ysky-compatible.html
www.massiverc.com/PrestaShop/en/206-hisk...ysky-compatible.html
Now for some Nine Eagles info.
The Solo Pro 125A is in two receiver types (I have both), one is the J6Pro, the other (BNF pack) comes with the SLT version of the General Link/Anylink module.
The Solo Pro 287 (I also have) comes with the J6Pro compatible version of the General Link module. There is currently no SLT version of the 287 that I know of.
The NE branded Solo Pro 319 Black Hawk (yep, also have
) comes as J6Pro version in the RTF pack and also with J6Pro compatible General Link in the BNF pack.
The two different General Link modules have already caused some confusion for people who have bought N.E. or Helimax products, so if anyone wants to make note of it in the list, the SLT version General Link is NE-480192 and the J6Pro version is NE-480133.
The "FS" variants of the two HiSky models have been on sale for the last few weeks in the U.S. at this site...
www.massiverc.com/PrestaShop/en/208-hisk...ysky-compatible.html
www.massiverc.com/PrestaShop/en/206-hisk...ysky-compatible.html
Now for some Nine Eagles info.
The Solo Pro 125A is in two receiver types (I have both), one is the J6Pro, the other (BNF pack) comes with the SLT version of the General Link/Anylink module.
The Solo Pro 287 (I also have) comes with the J6Pro compatible version of the General Link module. There is currently no SLT version of the 287 that I know of.
The NE branded Solo Pro 319 Black Hawk (yep, also have
The two different General Link modules have already caused some confusion for people who have bought N.E. or Helimax products, so if anyone wants to make note of it in the list, the SLT version General Link is NE-480192 and the J6Pro version is NE-480133.
- PhracturedBlue
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 4403
22 Feb 2014 15:01 #20742
by PhracturedBlue
Replied by PhracturedBlue on topic Bind Protocol and model list or database
Thanks, I think I captured everything
Time to create page: 0.193 seconds
-
Home
-
Forum
-
General
-
General Discussions
- Bind Protocol and model list or database