Telemetry bug?
- Tom Z
-
Topic Author
- Offline
Less
More
14 Apr 2014 15:17 - 14 Apr 2014 15:48 #22406
by Tom Z
Telemetry bug? was created by Tom Z
PhracturedBlue,
I posted a question for you but you didn't see the post.
My question:
PhracturedBlue,
You posted that "telemetry is definitely buggy. I can see random values on the telemetry screen when adjusting the throttle."
"I believe I've resolved the issue with corrupt Telemetry".
Is there a bug in the firmware using telemetry and you have resolved it in the nightly build which we all should be using if we want to use telemetry?
deviationtx.com/forum/6-general-discussi...light?start=20#22325
I posted a question for you but you didn't see the post.
My question:
PhracturedBlue,
You posted that "telemetry is definitely buggy. I can see random values on the telemetry screen when adjusting the throttle."
"I believe I've resolved the issue with corrupt Telemetry".
Is there a bug in the firmware using telemetry and you have resolved it in the nightly build which we all should be using if we want to use telemetry?
deviationtx.com/forum/6-general-discussi...light?start=20#22325
Last edit: 14 Apr 2014 15:48 by Tom Z.
- linux-user
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 271
16 Apr 2014 19:42 - 16 Apr 2014 20:07 #22479
by linux-user
The current nightly still suffers from issue #533 which makes telemetry somewhat unusable.
V4.0.1 does telemetry very well, as long as you are well within the range for telemetry.
For me, issue #525 in V4.0.1 is (at least partly) related to a hardware problem. See post #21524 .
But V4.0.1 seems to handle corrupt telemetry packets not very well, which may occur if you are close to the range limit for telemetry. See V120d02s-V2 lost binding mid flight .
We definitely need to do more research on telemetry.
Replied by linux-user on topic Telemetry bug?
Tom Z wrote: PhracturedBlue,
You posted that "telemetry is definitely buggy. I can see random values on the telemetry screen when adjusting the throttle."
"I believe I've resolved the issue with corrupt Telemetry".
Is there a bug in the firmware using telemetry and you have resolved it in the nightly build which we all should be using if we want to use telemetry?
deviationtx.com/forum/6-general-discussi...light?start=20#22325
The current nightly still suffers from issue #533 which makes telemetry somewhat unusable.
V4.0.1 does telemetry very well, as long as you are well within the range for telemetry.
For me, issue #525 in V4.0.1 is (at least partly) related to a hardware problem. See post #21524 .
But V4.0.1 seems to handle corrupt telemetry packets not very well, which may occur if you are close to the range limit for telemetry. See V120d02s-V2 lost binding mid flight .
We definitely need to do more research on telemetry.
Last edit: 16 Apr 2014 20:07 by linux-user.
- Tom Z
-
Topic Author
- Offline
16 Apr 2014 22:52 #22487
by Tom Z
Replied by Tom Z on topic Telemetry bug?
OK, I needed to know if the nightly build corrected this or not and to hear from PhracturedBlue that there is or is not a telemetry bug so I don't tell people the wrong thing.
I have been telling people that the V4.0.1 is the most stable version and there has not been any "reboot in flight" issues that I have seen. I will let people know about the telemetry.
I have been telling people that the V4.0.1 is the most stable version and there has not been any "reboot in flight" issues that I have seen. I will let people know about the telemetry.
- PhracturedBlue
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 4403
16 Apr 2014 23:20 #22489
by PhracturedBlue
Replied by PhracturedBlue on topic Telemetry bug?
4.0.1 is the most stable release, and the only one I recommend folks use unless they directly need a newer version.
I haven't had time to look at the telemetry range issue in nightly-builds. I thought they'd been corrected when I fixed the forward-range issue, so I would have expected #533 to be fixed as well, but as I didn't verify it, I can't be sure that is the case. If linux-user says it is still there, it likely is.
I haven't had time to look at the telemetry range issue in nightly-builds. I thought they'd been corrected when I fixed the forward-range issue, so I would have expected #533 to be fixed as well, but as I didn't verify it, I can't be sure that is the case. If linux-user says it is still there, it likely is.
- linux-user
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 271
17 Apr 2014 16:49 - 17 Apr 2014 18:45 #22509
by linux-user
I just did a short telemetry range test with nightly da8682f. (Devo10 - MiniCP)
I could get a telemetry range of ~50m, but the telemetry values tend to become marked invalid very easy, even if I am well within range limit. When telemetry values are marked invalid, they tend to stay invalid for a longer time, but may get valid again some time later.
Update:
Just cross checked with 689090a, which seems to behave the same, so #533 is still there, although the bug may not be exactly a range issue.
V4.0.1 definitely behaves different.
Replied by linux-user on topic Telemetry bug?
PhracturedBlue wrote: I haven't had time to look at the telemetry range issue in nightly-builds. I thought they'd been corrected when I fixed the forward-range issue, so I would have expected #533 to be fixed as well.
I just did a short telemetry range test with nightly da8682f. (Devo10 - MiniCP)
I could get a telemetry range of ~50m, but the telemetry values tend to become marked invalid very easy, even if I am well within range limit. When telemetry values are marked invalid, they tend to stay invalid for a longer time, but may get valid again some time later.
Update:
Just cross checked with 689090a, which seems to behave the same, so #533 is still there, although the bug may not be exactly a range issue.
V4.0.1 definitely behaves different.
Last edit: 17 Apr 2014 18:45 by linux-user. Reason: cross checked with 689090a and V4.0.1
Time to create page: 0.038 seconds
-
Home
-
Forum
-
General
-
General Discussions
- Telemetry bug?