- Posts: 706
Sky Viper nano m200
- magic_marty
-
Topic Author
- Offline
Less
More
26 Dec 2015 07:44 #41150
by magic_marty
Sky Viper nano m200 was created by magic_marty
Has or is anybody tried to capture the protocol on the sky viper m200? I tried all the current protocols in the latest nightly build but no joy in it binding..
- Rolo
-
- Offline
- Got time for that?
Less
More
- Posts: 4
30 Jan 2016 00:07 #42385
by Rolo
Replied by Rolo on topic Sky Viper nano m200
This would be a really cool one to be able to fly with 7e.
- goebish
-
- Offline
- NRF Weirdo
Less
More
- Posts: 2633
- jimw1956
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 26
17 Feb 2016 16:20 #43206
by jimw1956
Replied by jimw1956 on topic Sky Viper nano m200
It would totally be helpful, as the things drop out of the air randomly using the stock transmitter. This is a great little nano quad if it were not for that issue.
- victzh
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 1386
18 Feb 2016 20:03 #43253
by victzh
Replied by victzh on topic Sky Viper nano m200
Who knows, may be it's not transmitter to blame. Crappy radio can be present in the quad itself.
Those who have it - make detailed photos at least to evaluate feasibility.
Those who have it - make detailed photos at least to evaluate feasibility.
- jimw1956
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 26
23 Feb 2016 04:11 #43489
by jimw1956
Replied by jimw1956 on topic Sky Viper nano m200
All of the current Sky Viper models use the same protocol I believe. The S670 Stunt Drone would be really cool with the Devo as well.
- victzh
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 1386
07 Mar 2016 17:21 #44224
by victzh
Replied by victzh on topic Sky Viper nano m200
At least make hi-res photos of both TX and RX boards and put links here.
- victzh
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 1386
30 Mar 2016 01:27 #45415
by victzh
Replied by victzh on topic Sky Viper nano m200
A friend lent me one. It's most probably LT89xx based - the marking is thoroughly wiped off both TX and RX, but the chips has the same pinout.
- victzh
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 1386
30 Mar 2016 18:17 #45453
by victzh
Replied by victzh on topic Sky Viper nano m200
Got preliminary SPI capture. Seems to be using LT8900, not LT8910. That's good - emulation of LT8900 is done.
- arnoldsdad
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 1
14 Aug 2017 22:30 #63808
by arnoldsdad
Replied by arnoldsdad on topic Sky Viper nano m200
I was wondering if anyone got this to work, I just purchased a m550 and am curious
- tones
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 1
05 May 2018 22:35 #69068
by tones
Replied by tones on topic Sky Viper nano m200
I have an m550 I'd love to get to work with my Jumper T8sg. Is there a way that I haven't been able to find? Sorry, I'm quite the quad and modern day r/c newbie, and maybe I just don't know how to look for the answer yet due to lack of speaking "the lingo". TIA for any hints!
Btw, in reading through the posts, I saw that someone suggested pretty much all the Sky Viper models use the same protocol. I have an s1700 stunt drone in addition to the m550 nano, and the larger s1700 controller did not work with the m550 quad, so it appears at least those two models are different.
Btw, in reading through the posts, I saw that someone suggested pretty much all the Sky Viper models use the same protocol. I have an s1700 stunt drone in addition to the m550 nano, and the larger s1700 controller did not work with the m550 quad, so it appears at least those two models are different.
Time to create page: 0.107 seconds
-
Home
-
Forum
-
Development
-
Protocol Development
- Sky Viper nano m200