×

Notice

The forum is in read only mode.
  1. Forum
  3. Development
  5. Protocol Development
  7. Flyer 668

Flyer 668

More
06 Apr 2016 13:33 #45918 by ogrope1
Flyer 668 was created by ogrope1
Hi, I have been flying these for a while now and even with the stock tx its one of the best nanos I have tried. I really feel this could be the best nano if deviated, fingers crossed... I am leaving a link for the cheapest place it could be had(14$) www.gearbest.com/rc-quadcopters/pp_265982.html
Attachments:
More
07 Apr 2016 14:53 #46032 by SeByDocKy
Replied by SeByDocKy on topic Flyer 668

ogrope1 wrote: Hi, I have been flying these for a while now and even with the stock tx its one of the best nanos I have tried. I really feel this could be the best nano if deviated, fingers crossed... I am leaving a link for the cheapest place it could be had(14$) www.gearbest.com/rc-quadcopters/pp_265982.html


Sound like a XN297 RF chip ...
More
07 Apr 2016 15:18 #46035 by ogrope1
Replied by ogrope1 on topic Flyer 668
Thanks seb, so in theory it is compatible, correct?
More
08 Apr 2016 22:28 #46137 by victzh
Replied by victzh on topic Flyer 668
What do you mean by theory? That it's not a totally alien radio chip? Probably (I can't read what't written on it on this photo). It can be LT8900 or LT8910. They are known but less developed.
More
11 Apr 2016 11:53 #46314 by goebish
Replied by goebish on topic Flyer 668
Very few passives around the RF chip + antenna connected directly to it = 95% chance this is a LT8900 / LT8910.
More
11 Apr 2016 13:14 #46315 by ogrope1
Replied by ogrope1 on topic Flyer 668
This sounds like good news if I understand correctly. I am willing to pay for an unit if someone is interested in trying to get it working, I really feel its worth it.
More
11 Apr 2016 13:32 - 11 Apr 2016 13:38 #46316 by goebish
Replied by goebish on topic Flyer 668
Not really, only the LT8900 can be emulated right now (and only if it's not using whitening).

Quite a bit of work is still required for LT8910 if it's using one of the lower bitrates (will require a CC2500 module in the Devo).
Last edit: 11 Apr 2016 13:38 by goebish.
More
11 Apr 2016 20:16 #46323 by goebish
Replied by goebish on topic Flyer 668
It could be a HS6200P as well, I started working on emulating it ( here ) but I need to order a machine that's using it to complete the work.
More
12 Apr 2016 18:50 #46375 by ogrope1
Replied by ogrope1 on topic Flyer 668
Ok, thanks for the inputs.
More
27 May 2016 21:44 #49402 by Multirotor Go
Replied by Multirotor Go on topic Flyer 668
How are de advancement on deviating this one?
More
31 May 2016 23:22 #49687 by Multirotor Go
Replied by Multirotor Go on topic Flyer 668
  1. Forum
  3. Development
  5. Protocol Development
  7. Flyer 668
Time to create page: 0.192 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
Force desktop display