protocol for WL Heli V911-s

More
21 Apr 2019 13:51 #74066 by SeByDocKy
Replied by SeByDocKy on topic protocol for WL Heli V911-s

goebish wrote: Ok, nightly build is still using nrf24, not the cc2500 (still experimental).

You mean the test build works with default ID 123456 now ? I though it didn't work



Just reading in diagonal .... Are you able now to reproduce any 256kbit/s nRF24L01 based with a CC250 ?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
21 Apr 2019 14:11 - 21 Apr 2019 14:13 #74067 by goebish
Replied by goebish on topic protocol for WL Heli V911-s
XN297L@250kbps, yes :)
work in progress: github.com/DeviationTX/deviation/pull/860

Seems it works way better than using the nrf24l01 (E010 working flawlessly) but there are still some issues with other protocols (V911S, GD00X).

iirc you have an YZ i6S, that's one of the protocols using this mode, would you like that I add it to the test build ? Not a very popular model, you might be the only one able to test it ;)
Last edit: 21 Apr 2019 14:13 by goebish.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
21 Apr 2019 14:43 #74068 by SeByDocKy
Replied by SeByDocKy on topic protocol for WL Heli V911-s

goebish wrote: XN297L@250kbps, yes :)

iirc you have an YZ i6S, that's one of the protocols using this mode, would you like that I add it to the test build ? Not a very popular model, you might be the only one able to test it ;)



Outch..... the question; where is this one.... I moved a lot under my house .... yes under ... in the small saninatary void . :)
but maybe not this one coz it's a small model.... I will have too look a bit in next days

Good news for the CC2500 workaround

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
21 Apr 2019 14:46 #74069 by goebish
Replied by goebish on topic protocol for WL Heli V911-s
dozens of models scattered everywhere around the house, I know what you mean ;)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
21 Apr 2019 16:06 #74075 by SeByDocKy
Replied by SeByDocKy on topic protocol for WL Heli V911-s

goebish wrote: dozens of models scattered everywhere around the house, I know what you mean ;)



For me it's around 400 :)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
21 Apr 2019 23:25 #74078 by dc59
Replied by dc59 on topic protocol for WL Heli V911-s
Yes, 123456 works now with Frq-Fine set to 25, I will try another IDs and will report results if I get good news! :cheer:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
21 Apr 2019 23:30 - 21 Apr 2019 23:56 #74079 by demonogura
Replied by demonogura on topic protocol for WL Heli V911-s
Good morning, goebish.

Test build deviation-t8sg_v2_plus-v5.0.0-ee7176e

We will notify you of the bind test results.

XK K100. JJRC H8-MINI.H8S-3D.H98, X400, X600, X800, SYMA X5C-1 worked without any problem.
Last edit: 21 Apr 2019 23:56 by demonogura.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
23 Apr 2019 08:15 #74107 by Kio
Replied by Kio on topic protocol for WL Heli V911-s
Nice to meet you all,

My t8sg v2 plus can't bind V911S at ee7176e
Tried Freq-Fine -127 to 127 in 5 intervals at ID 123456.
Does V911S have different IDs depending on individuals?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
23 Apr 2019 08:35 #74108 by dc59
Replied by dc59 on topic protocol for WL Heli V911-s

Kio wrote: Nice to meet you all,

My t8sg v2 plus can't bind V911S at ee7176e
Tried Freq-Fine -127 to 127 in 5 intervals at ID 123456.
Does V911S have different IDs depending on individuals?


my v911s worked with ID : 123456 / 888888 / 999999 , Freq-Fine=25.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
23 Apr 2019 10:17 - 23 Apr 2019 10:18 #74110 by goebish
Replied by goebish on topic protocol for WL Heli V911-s

Kio wrote: Nice to meet you all,

My t8sg v2 plus can't bind V911S at ee7176e
Tried Freq-Fine -127 to 127 in 5 intervals at ID 123456.
Does V911S have different IDs depending on individuals?


The aircraft itself doesn't have an ID, only the transmitter, also using ID 123456 with a Deviation transmitter isn't the same than using 123456 on another one because this number is mixed with your unique MCU serial number before being used.

I'll get back when I have other things to try ...
Last edit: 23 Apr 2019 10:18 by goebish.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
23 Apr 2019 11:14 #74112 by Kio
Replied by Kio on topic protocol for WL Heli V911-s
Thank you dc59,
Thank you goebish,

I tried trying ID: 123456/888888/999999, Freq-Fine = 25. My V911S did not respond.

It seems that you need to try various combinations.

Also, I will try it next time.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
26 Apr 2019 00:16 #74136 by old4570
Replied by old4570 on topic protocol for WL Heli V911-s
HAd time to play = Flaky !
Tx just turns off for no reason , and all settings are lost ...

No bind yet !
I will try and change the ID , but a CRASHING OS means I cant use the firmware for flying .. ( Which is OK , I have a T12 )

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
07 May 2019 00:54 #74255 by gdenton
Replied by gdenton on topic protocol for WL Heli V911-s
I purchased/received an XK A120-A380 plane, a guy on Youtube found that it would work with the V911-S protocol.
I first tried to bind it to my Devo 6S tx (nightly build, 4-in-1 module), no dice.
I then found it would bind to my 7E (with standalone nrf24l01 module) and also my Devo 10 (same brand 4-in-1 module as the 6S).
I installed goebish's test build linked to earlier in this thread on my 6S tx and still no dice, I varied the freq. fine tune the whole range in steps of 20, varied the Fixed ID, but still no luck.
Any suggestions?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
08 May 2019 07:56 #74260 by cmpang
Replied by cmpang on topic protocol for WL Heli V911-s
yes I can bind my XK A120-A380 plane with my 7e on V911-S protocol, ID = 123456 too

will try with my friend's Jumper T8SG in these two days

cmPang

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
18 May 2019 13:30 #74338 by fin
Replied by fin on topic protocol for WL Heli V911-s
Hi, I am always thankful to the developers.
I tried goebish's test-build / CC2500 (ee7176e) with several transmitters I own.

txidFreqFinePowerResult
Devo6 w/ 4in1123456-50~+501mAhFailure
123456-1271mAhFailure
123456-12710mAhSuccess
123456-12730mAhSuccess
123456-127100mAhFailure
123456-127150mAhFailure
Devo7e w/ 4in1123456-50~+501mAhFailure
123456-1271~150mAhFailure
Devo7e w/ 3in1123456-50~+501mAhFailure
123456-1271~150mAhFailure
Devo10 w/ 4in1123456-50~+501mAhFailure
123456-1271~150mAhFailure
IR8M123456-50~+501mAhFailure
123456-1271~150mAhFailure
T8SG (1st Gen)123456-50~+501mAhFailure
T8SG V2 Plus (1)123456-50~+501mAhFailure
123456-1271mAhSuccess
123456-12710mAhSuccess
111111-1271mAhFailure
888888-1271mAhFailure
999999-1271mAhFailure
123455-1271mAhFailure
123457-1271mAhFailure
T8SG V2 Plus (2)123456-1271mAhFailure
123456-1273mAhFailure
123456-12710mAhFailure
123456-12730mAhFailure
123456-127100mAhFailure
123456-127150mAhFailure

I can not understand. It should be the same but success or failure.
If I keep making mistakes, I wonder if I can not bind at all even if I set the same transmitters until then.
The transmitter I own is equipped with almost all 4in1 modules.
Devo6, Devo7e and Devo10 are Retail version 4in1 modules purchased at the same time.
The IR8M is an initial version, but the 4in1 module has been replaced with the Retail version.
There are two T8 SGV2 + s. It is what I purchased recently with 1st lot.
As for the value of Freq-Fine, since the value set for the first successful Devo 6 was -127, it is set and tested on other transmitters as a successful example.
The ID succeeded only 123456.
It fails or succeeds due to transmission output. Even if the output is small, it is useless, too large, it seems like useless, is there a sweet spot? I do not understand.

p.s. I can only speak Japanese. This sentence is in English with GoogleTransrate. I am afraid that I have not transmitted it correctly. Thank you sorry.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
18 May 2019 13:36 #74339 by goebish
Replied by goebish on topic protocol for WL Heli V911-s
Thank you for testing!
The problem is not understood yet, but we're working on it behind the scene ;)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
21 May 2019 15:29 #74369 by wasp09
Replied by wasp09 on topic protocol for WL Heli V911-s
Hi Goebish,

It has been a while since I last flew my micro's, It took me a while to figure out which protocol to use over the weekend as I was sharing ini files for some of them. :(

Somehow I had to rebind my V977 with XK Rx and K100. Not sure if they can loose binding in staying powered down for too long.

According to my counting, I have more than 10 sub120 working micros but I still want to add a V911S. :)

Is this working yet?

Would it be it an issue with crystal? Is it cc250 or nrf24l01 based?

Regards

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
21 May 2019 15:50 #74370 by goebish
Replied by goebish on topic protocol for WL Heli V911-s
I'm don't think center frequency is the problem with V911S because using the cc2500 with frequency tuning doesn't fix the issue ...

Try the nightly build (it's using the nrf24l01 for V911S) and the test build I posted in this thread (it's using the cc2500 and has freq-tune option) then report ;)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
21 May 2019 15:58 - 28 Jun 2019 16:40 #74371 by wasp09
Replied by wasp09 on topic protocol for WL Heli V911-s
I haven't bought it yet. Probably would have one in July or August.

Thanks.

+++++++

Is the protocol working?

If I buy a V911S BNF, my devo 10 has to be able to control it.
Last edit: 28 Jun 2019 16:40 by wasp09.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
23 Oct 2019 08:35 - 23 Oct 2019 08:38 #75298 by TrungVu
Replied by TrungVu on topic protocol for WL Heli V911-s

goebish wrote: Yes :)
www.deviationtx.com/forum/protocol-devel...911-s?start=40#71667


Devo10-v911s
i have successfully connected with devo10 (fw deviation-devo10-v5.0.0-7fb7de1) . thanks Goebish :cheer:
Attachments:
Last edit: 23 Oct 2019 08:38 by TrungVu.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.085 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum