- Posts: 1
DEVO 12E
- CookieM
-
Topic Author
- Offline
Less
More
- Joe6pack
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 1
- IMback!
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 84
10 Oct 2014 11:05 - 10 Oct 2014 11:05 #26026
by IMback!
Replied by IMback! on topic DEVO 12E
Well I dont think anyone knows, without trying. It very mutch depends on how different the devo 12e is from the devo 10. If they just connected new switches to unused pins on the mcu Then deviation for devo 10 would work, just without the extra switches. If they rearanged the pins or chaned the mcu in any way deviation would not work without modifications/
In any case supporting the devo 12e is likely possible with minnimal effort.
In any case supporting the devo 12e is likely possible with minnimal effort.
Last edit: 10 Oct 2014 11:05 by IMback!.
- CalifGuy
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 1
21 Nov 2014 16:49 #26485
by CalifGuy
Anyone successfully try this yet? Getting ready to pickup a new radio and the Devo 12E with Deviation would be ideal.
Replied by CalifGuy on topic DEVO 12E
Joe6pack wrote: Hello,
that would interest me too.
I'm about to buy a Devo. Either 10 or 12E.
Runs Deviation on a 12E?
Anyone successfully try this yet? Getting ready to pickup a new radio and the Devo 12E with Deviation would be ideal.
- schwarzsurfer
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 20
- dlawso
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 4
- kreidler
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 157
- Emc2
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 2
- Emc2
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 2
- gektor
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 8
- linux-user
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 271
- FDR
-
- Offline
- gektor
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 8
- schwarzsurfer
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 20
- vlad_vy
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 3333
11 Mar 2015 10:55 - 11 Mar 2015 11:01 #29565
by vlad_vy
Replied by vlad_vy on topic DEVO 12E
Both PCB (Devo 10 and Devo 12E) have very similar layout. Added AUX7 and AUX5 connectors and renamed AUX1 to AUX4 and AUX2 to AUX6 connectors. I think will be enought to trace connections for AUX4 - AUX7 to MCU pins (probably center contact only - center output of pot).
Last edit: 11 Mar 2015 11:01 by vlad_vy.
- netnerd
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 5
17 Mar 2015 06:39 #29773
by netnerd
Replied by netnerd on topic DEVO 12E
Oh cool, there's people talking here. I was going to make a post quickly but decided to do a search first.
I'm thinking about ordering in a DEVO 12E to run deviation on it and a while ago (didn't have funds at the time) I looked into making the appropriate modifications to the source. Because it's so similar to the DEVO 10, I think that just adding the extra knobs to some target files copied from the DEVO 10 and changing the target name and whatnot was pretty much all I needed to do to get what I felt should work.
Walkera Fans has a copy of the firmware and the crypt for dfu.py appears to be 12, as was to be expected.
If anyone absolutely needs a build, I can try running one off, but it would be untested and it's probably better to let the more skilled people figure it out.
I'm thinking about ordering in a DEVO 12E to run deviation on it and a while ago (didn't have funds at the time) I looked into making the appropriate modifications to the source. Because it's so similar to the DEVO 10, I think that just adding the extra knobs to some target files copied from the DEVO 10 and changing the target name and whatnot was pretty much all I needed to do to get what I felt should work.
Walkera Fans has a copy of the firmware and the crypt for dfu.py appears to be 12, as was to be expected.
If anyone absolutely needs a build, I can try running one off, but it would be untested and it's probably better to let the more skilled people figure it out.
- PhracturedBlue
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 4403
17 Mar 2015 13:51 #29775
by PhracturedBlue
Replied by PhracturedBlue on topic DEVO 12E
I compared the devo12e images to the devo10 images.
It looks like PA0 and PD9 have new connections, and I don't see any other pin changes on the STM32.
PA0 is ADC0, but PD9 is a purely digital pin. So it is possible they swapped some pins around to get usable ADC pins.
It looks like PA0 and PD9 have new connections, and I don't see any other pin changes on the STM32.
PA0 is ADC0, but PD9 is a purely digital pin. So it is possible they swapped some pins around to get usable ADC pins.
- netnerd
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 5
17 Mar 2015 14:34 #29777
by netnerd
Replied by netnerd on topic DEVO 12E
That makes sense. I did have a look at the pin assignments originally, but I don't do very much electronics work. It was a bit hard to make sense of it all, but I kinda figured that PD9 was effectively doing nothing we can actually see because of a missing jumper, although PA0 is definitely of interest. Is it possible for the to be something hidden underneath the chip?
Anyway, I guess that actual hardware is the only way forwards, huh?
Anyway, I guess that actual hardware is the only way forwards, huh?
- PhracturedBlue
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 4403
- PhracturedBlue
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 4403
17 Mar 2015 18:42 #29782
by PhracturedBlue
Replied by PhracturedBlue on topic DEVO 12E
I built a test-build for the devo12e here:
www.deviationtx.com/downloads-new/category/32-test-builds
Once someone tests it, I'll add it to the nightly-build scripts
www.deviationtx.com/downloads-new/category/32-test-builds
Once someone tests it, I'll add it to the nightly-build scripts
Time to create page: 0.191 seconds
-
Home
-
Forum
-
General
-
General Discussions
- DEVO 12E