- Posts: 409
Bugs 3 mini
- C0ckpitvue 777
-
Topic Author
- Offline
Less
More
10 Jun 2018 21:27 #69603
by C0ckpitvue 777
Replied by C0ckpitvue 777 on topic Bugs 3 mini
I took 2 more captures of the bind sequence in angle mode just in case I missed something.
www.mediafire.com/file/vihmx7ajkrhvha3/T...n+bound..........zip
www.mediafire.com/file/vihmx7ajkrhvha3/T...n+bound..........zip
- goebish
-
- Offline
- NRF Weirdo
Less
More
- Posts: 2633
11 Jun 2018 09:52 - 11 Jun 2018 14:49 #69607
by goebish
Replied by goebish on topic Bugs 3 mini
That's not an easy protocol, but I see it shares some similarities with the Bugs 3 (not mini) protocol, such as the packet checksum and arm/disarm flags ...
I'll have a better look at hexfet & mmakai work, I hope I'll find more similarities.
I'll have a better look at hexfet & mmakai work, I hope I'll find more similarities.
Last edit: 11 Jun 2018 14:49 by goebish.
- goebish
-
- Offline
- NRF Weirdo
Less
More
- Posts: 2633
11 Jun 2018 12:29 - 05 Oct 2018 20:36 #69608
by goebish
Replied by goebish on topic Bugs 3 mini
Well, unfortunately I think I won't be able to make a lot of progress without having at least a stock TX myself. The RXID -> data address mapping is not the same than Bugs 3 protocol 
RXID: 68 FC, TXID: A8 E6 32, address: 68 6C FC 3D 5A (C0ckpitvue 777)
RXID: 8C 20, TXID: DD AB FD, address: 8C 9E 20 6B 3D (DPyro)
Last edit: 05 Oct 2018 20:36 by goebish.
- DPyro
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 43
08 Jul 2018 15:25 #69814
by DPyro
Replied by DPyro on topic Bugs 3 mini
What do you need to make progress with this protocol?
- C0ckpitvue 777
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 409
08 Jul 2018 18:27 #69816
by C0ckpitvue 777
Replied by C0ckpitvue 777 on topic Bugs 3 mini
I can ship my tx to any guru who wants to deviate this but someone will have to probably send them an rx.Goebish said he couldn't do anything else with it without having a tx.If the shipping prices are reasonable I am willing to ship my tx which is analyzer ready.
- C0ckpitvue 777
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 409
03 Aug 2018 03:00 #70043
by C0ckpitvue 777
Replied by C0ckpitvue 777 on topic Bugs 3 mini
Is there anything being done or needed for this to be deviated?
- goebish
-
- Offline
- NRF Weirdo
Less
More
- Posts: 2633
20 Aug 2018 19:31 - 20 Aug 2018 19:32 #70363
by goebish
Replied by goebish on topic Bugs 3 mini
Sorry, I missed your messages, time is lacking right now but I note your offer.
edit: I'm not sure but probably a rx is required as well ...
edit: I'm not sure but probably a rx is required as well ...
Last edit: 20 Aug 2018 19:32 by goebish.
- C0ckpitvue 777
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 409
26 Aug 2018 02:15 #70456
by C0ckpitvue 777
Replied by C0ckpitvue 777 on topic Bugs 3 mini
Hello Goebish,I sent you a p.m with shipping info,just wondering if you received it.
- planger
-
- Offline
21 Sep 2018 17:10 - 21 Sep 2018 21:48 #71002
by planger
Replied by planger on topic Bugs 3 mini
The bugs 3H looks to be using the same payload:
www.deviationtx.com/forum/protocol-devel...ugs-3h?start=0#70986
The NRF bind address is the same 0x6D,0x6A,0x78,0x52,0x43 but strangely there is one difference in the frequencies, one value is different and inserted at a different spot:
Bugs3 mini: 0x1A,0x23,0x2C,0x35,0x3E,0x17,0x20,0x29,0x32,0x3B,0x14,0x1D,0x26,0x2F,0x38
Bugs3 H : 0x1A,0x23,0x2C,0x35,0x17,0x20,0x29,0x32,0x3B,0x14,0x1D,0x26,0x2F,0x38,0x11
The NRF bind address is the same 0x6D,0x6A,0x78,0x52,0x43 but strangely there is one difference in the frequencies, one value is different and inserted at a different spot:
Bugs3 mini: 0x1A,0x23,0x2C,0x35,0x3E,0x17,0x20,0x29,0x32,0x3B,0x14,0x1D,0x26,0x2F,0x38
Bugs3 H : 0x1A,0x23,0x2C,0x35,0x17,0x20,0x29,0x32,0x3B,0x14,0x1D,0x26,0x2F,0x38,0x11
Last edit: 21 Sep 2018 21:48 by planger.
- Deezyy2476
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 6
22 Sep 2018 04:08 #71007
by Deezyy2476
Replied by Deezyy2476 on topic Bugs 3 mini
Mini has acro and h does not. Only difference I could think of
- aszasza
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 33
25 Sep 2018 12:22 #71028
by aszasza
Replied by aszasza on topic Bugs 3 mini
I can confirm that the same radio can be used for the 3H and for the mini.
- planger
-
- Offline
26 Sep 2018 17:21 #71044
by planger
Replied by planger on topic Bugs 3 mini
Does anyone has a radio with a multi protocol module to test on? Otherwise I'll let Goebish give it a go...
- DPyro
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 43
26 Sep 2018 20:19 #71051
by DPyro
Replied by DPyro on topic Bugs 3 mini
I have a Devo 7e with all-in-one.planger wrote: Does anyone has a radio with a multi protocol module to test on? Otherwise I'll let Goebish give it a go...
- C0ckpitvue 777
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 409
26 Sep 2018 23:34 #71055
by C0ckpitvue 777
Replied by C0ckpitvue 777 on topic Bugs 3 mini
I also have a devo 10 with the banggood 4in1 installed.
- aszasza
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 33
28 Sep 2018 22:16 #71088
by aszasza
Replied by aszasza on topic Bugs 3 mini
I have an x-lite with the 4in1 module, a bugs3h and a bugs3 mini board that I can bind to the 3h's radio.
- goebish
-
- Offline
- NRF Weirdo
Less
More
- Posts: 2633
30 Sep 2018 11:55 #71101
by goebish
Replied by goebish on topic Bugs 3 mini
I now have a bugs 3 mini tx & rx (thanks C0ckpitvue 777 !!!), I'll see what I can do during the week or next week-end.
- aszasza
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 33
30 Sep 2018 12:18 #71102
by aszasza
Replied by aszasza on topic Bugs 3 mini
Brilliant, let me know if I can help you testing. Maybe with the 3H.
- goebish
-
- Offline
- NRF Weirdo
Less
More
- Posts: 2633
05 Oct 2018 17:19 #71188
by goebish
Replied by goebish on topic Bugs 3 mini
Making some progress:
I'm not sure if it only works with my RX or with any bugs3 mini ... (ie is rxid used to compute 3 bytes of the xn297 address and the hopping sequence or not).
C0ckpitvue 777, here's a test build for Devo10, can you do as in the video and tell me if it binds ?
www.dropbox.com/sh/nrc4oppo121887l/AABQ_...IEn8A7BYvH5BpGa?dl=0
(led = channel 5, arming is not implemented for now, this is just a test)
I'm not sure if it only works with my RX or with any bugs3 mini ... (ie is rxid used to compute 3 bytes of the xn297 address and the hopping sequence or not).
C0ckpitvue 777, here's a test build for Devo10, can you do as in the video and tell me if it binds ?
www.dropbox.com/sh/nrc4oppo121887l/AABQ_...IEn8A7BYvH5BpGa?dl=0
(led = channel 5, arming is not implemented for now, this is just a test)
- goebish
-
- Offline
- NRF Weirdo
Less
More
- Posts: 2633
05 Oct 2018 19:57 - 06 Oct 2018 11:03 #71189
by goebish
Replied by goebish on topic Bugs 3 mini
Update: I tested with both C0ckpitvue 777 and my TX ids and was able to bind to my RX !
That means it doesn't matter if we're not able to crack txid / data address / rf hopping relationships, we can live with the sets (only 2) we have for now.
@DPyro can you capture the bind sequence from your transmitter so we have one more set please ?
(Connect a battery to the quad first, wait slow blink, launch capture, hold the arm button then switch the transmitter on, it should beep twice).
That means it doesn't matter if we're not able to crack txid / data address / rf hopping relationships, we can live with the sets (only 2) we have for now.
@DPyro can you capture the bind sequence from your transmitter so we have one more set please ?
(Connect a battery to the quad first, wait slow blink, launch capture, hold the arm button then switch the transmitter on, it should beep twice).
Last edit: 06 Oct 2018 11:03 by goebish.
- DPyro
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 43
05 Oct 2018 22:15 - 05 Oct 2018 22:18 #71190
by DPyro
Replied by DPyro on topic Bugs 3 mini
I already posted bind on the 1st page. I don't currently have analyzer connected right now.
EDIT: Can you post a test build for the devo 7e?
EDIT: Can you post a test build for the devo 7e?
Last edit: 05 Oct 2018 22:18 by DPyro.
Time to create page: 0.123 seconds
-
Home
-
Forum
-
Development
-
Protocol Development
- Bugs 3 mini