C-17 Transport

More
03 Jul 2019 17:24 #74667 by goebish
Replied by goebish on topic C-17 Transport
I don't understand, do you need a channel to set low rate mode because it doesn't work the same on V1 & ZC ?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
03 Jul 2019 17:24 - 03 Jul 2019 17:31 #74668 by planger
Replied by planger on topic C-17 Transport
I see what you mean but can you make sure first it's not your badly calibrated sticks that creates what you are seeing.
Last edit: 03 Jul 2019 17:31 by planger.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
03 Jul 2019 17:29 #74669 by planger
Replied by planger on topic C-17 Transport

goebish wrote: I don't understand, do you need a channel to set low rate mode because it doesn't work the same on V1 & ZC ?

The ZC has a separated motor for propulsion that the GD does not have so rate could play a role on the speed of the main motor. But first he needs to calibrate the sticks to rule that out from the equation.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
03 Jul 2019 17:30 #74670 by tianma780
Replied by tianma780 on topic C-17 Transport
no ,I mean

when the throttle -100,
the aileron -1 or 1 the motor go not so fast! now is too fast

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
03 Jul 2019 17:33 #74672 by planger
Replied by planger on topic C-17 Transport

tianma780 wrote: no ,I mean

when the throttle -100,
the aileron -1 or 1 the motor go not so fast! now is too fast

This is the behavior of the model. If throttle is -100 and you turn the ailerons both motors go to high speed. The original remote is doing the same.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
03 Jul 2019 17:38 #74673 by tianma780
Replied by tianma780 on topic C-17 Transport
yes ,can you tell me how to change the code to put it down,I think it is hard to landing but good to role!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
03 Jul 2019 17:40 #74674 by tianma780
Replied by tianma780 on topic C-17 Transport
Hello goebish and Pascal,can you check the code of V2,
the Throttle from -99 to -66 the motor speed not change.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
09 Aug 2020 15:07 - 09 Aug 2020 15:09 #76664 by tianma780
Replied by tianma780 on topic C-17 Transport
Hello gobish and planger

Can you tell me how to change the code

So when the throttle is -100 and I turn the ailerons both motors do nothing (dont go to high speed,it is hard to land)
Thank you!
Last edit: 09 Aug 2020 15:09 by tianma780.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
03 Mar 2023 08:29 #78232 by gke
Replied by gke on topic C-17 Transport
Very quick question. Did GD00X V1&V2 make it into the T8SGV2Plus builds? Thanks

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
03 Mar 2023 09:10 #78233 by goebish
Replied by goebish on topic C-17 Transport
Hi gke, long time no see!

I had a quick look at the source code, looks like V2 has never made its way onto Deviation, shouldn't be hard to port from MPM tho.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
03 Mar 2023 10:39 - 03 Mar 2023 10:41 #78234 by gke
Replied by gke on topic C-17 Transport
Thanks goebish - yep still "alive and kicking" here. I will grab the latest source and adapt the MPM code I get Docker running with a local copy. I need to add an A120 V2 variant to MT9xxx or whatever as well. One of my mates has an ancient Jumper and would like to try that before just buying something sensible. Like many I am running MPM along with EdgeTx.
Last edit: 03 Mar 2023 10:41 by gke.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
05 Mar 2023 21:47 #78235 by gke
Replied by gke on topic C-17 Transport (Rant)
Off topic mini rant.

I installed Docker etc and did a partial port of the GD00xx GD_V2 code from MPM - there has been a big change in coding style.

Deviation is an important step to where we are now but I have decided that the T8SG is pretty much dead. As for Docker it is just part of the continuing Tower of Babel tendency - entropy! Fortunately MPM elected to go with the contained chaos of Arduino where you can grab a local clone make some changes and you are done.

I have convinced my friend to go with MPM and probably a Tx16S or similar.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.054 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum