C-17 Transport
- planger
-
Topic Author
- Offline
Less
More
25 Mar 2019 19:03 #73554
by planger
Replied by planger on topic C-17 Transport
Where is my SDR device when I need it...
I've got hard time figuring out the channels used since there is a lot of bleeding to other channels. The NRF is picking up echo on many channels. I'm running long scans, enough to find out the main channels being used but I'm not sure if I'm missing a channel which could have inteferences with another signal...
Let's see how far I can get.
I've got hard time figuring out the channels used since there is a lot of bleeding to other channels. The NRF is picking up echo on many channels. I'm running long scans, enough to find out the main channels being used but I'm not sure if I'm missing a channel which could have inteferences with another signal...
Let's see how far I can get.
- Fernandez
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 983
25 Mar 2019 20:24 #73555
by Fernandez
Replied by Fernandez on topic C-17 Transport
Impressive how you manage to "puzzle" protocols
- Fer
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 203
03 Apr 2019 20:08 #73674
by Fer
Replied by Fer on topic C-17 Transport
Hello. Received my C-17 today. Binds ok with the toy tx it comes with, but unfortunately doesn't bind with my DEVO 10 with latest (8cfcb5d) Nightly Build.
Is it because it is an even newer protocol, or is there something else i must do?
Is it because it is an even newer protocol, or is there something else i must do?
- goebish
-
- Offline
- NRF Weirdo
Less
More
- Posts: 2633
03 Apr 2019 20:09 #73675
by goebish
Replied by goebish on topic C-17 Transport
Probably the newer protocol, Pascal started working on it.
- Fer
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 203
03 Apr 2019 20:11 #73676
by Fer
Thank you. The C-17 will have to wait then.
Replied by Fer on topic C-17 Transport
Fastest reply evergoebish wrote: Probably the newer protocol, Pascal started working on it.
- planger
-
Topic Author
- Offline
04 Apr 2019 08:07 #73683
by planger
Replied by planger on topic C-17 Transport
The new RX has this reference: GD9001-102RX2. Is that your case?
Pascal
Pascal
- Fer
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 203
04 Apr 2019 13:20 #73684
by Fer
Where was that written on? If its one the rx, i have glued the battery hatch in place, and it will be damaged if i try to remove it.
Also, the tx is not easy to open too... The sticks are soldered to the lower part, while the opening for the levers on the upper part, is not wide enough to allow the stick ends to pass through. I can not seperate the two parts to have a look at the board. Unless i am missing something...
Replied by Fer on topic C-17 Transport
planger wrote: The new RX has this reference: GD9001-102RX2. Is that your case?
Pascal
Where was that written on? If its one the rx, i have glued the battery hatch in place, and it will be damaged if i try to remove it.
Also, the tx is not easy to open too... The sticks are soldered to the lower part, while the opening for the levers on the upper part, is not wide enough to allow the stick ends to pass through. I can not seperate the two parts to have a look at the board. Unless i am missing something...
- planger
-
Topic Author
- Offline
04 Apr 2019 14:49 #73685
by planger
Replied by planger on topic C-17 Transport
The reference I gave you was on the RX. One difference that you might remember is the RX antenna. On V1 the antenna is quite big with a dipole at the end (like this
abra-electronics.com/images/detailed/142/ANT-21-_1_.jpg
) where the V2 has a simple wire instead.
On V2 I've emulated the bind part but the normal packet mode transmission scheme is extra weird. I will probably look at it again next week.
Pascal
On V2 I've emulated the bind part but the normal packet mode transmission scheme is extra weird. I will probably look at it again next week.
Pascal
- Fer
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 203
04 Apr 2019 20:53 #73692
by Fer
I am sorry, i really can't remember and all i see now is the end of the antenna comming out of a hole in the battery compartment. I can't remember if it is an antenna like the one you showed in the picture, or a simple wire comming out from the rx.
Every time i get a new plane, heli or quad, i take many pictures to see what goes where in case it is needed. This time it was so little efford to assemble the plane that i didn't take any pics... what could go wrong??? (lol).
Replied by Fer on topic C-17 Transport
Every time i get a new plane, heli or quad, i take many pictures to see what goes where in case it is needed. This time it was so little efford to assemble the plane that i didn't take any pics... what could go wrong??? (lol).
- planger
-
Topic Author
- Offline
09 Apr 2019 20:40 #73750
by planger
Replied by planger on topic C-17 Transport
Ok, I've got the protocol working with only 1 ID for now. I would need other dumps to see if we can figure out a pattern.
Is someone willing to send their TX?
Goebish, do you want to port this work in progress?
Pascal
Is someone willing to send their TX?
Goebish, do you want to port this work in progress?
Pascal
- goebish
-
- Offline
- NRF Weirdo
Less
More
- Posts: 2633
09 Apr 2019 21:14 #73751
by goebish
Replied by goebish on topic C-17 Transport
I can see it on your github, I'll port it.
Not a big deal if there's only 1 ID for now, there's already a few (sub)protocols like that ...
Not a big deal if there's only 1 ID for now, there's already a few (sub)protocols like that ...
- planger
-
Topic Author
- Offline
09 Apr 2019 22:02 - 09 Apr 2019 22:04 #73752
by planger
Replied by planger on topic C-17 Transport
I need a couple more hours to fully reverse the ID (trial and errors)...
So far I've got some more IDs working with these rules:
- payload xor = rx_tx_addr[0]^rx_tx_addr[1]^rx_tx_addr[2]
- hopping_frequency[0]=0x05+((rx_tx_addr[0]^rx_tx_addr[1]^rx_tx_addr[2]^rx_tx_addr[3])&0x0F);
- hopping_frequency[1]=0x20+hopping_frequency[0];
But there is something more like a check since for some values it doesn't bind at all, for others the hopping frequencies are wrong and others one of the frequency seems wrong.
Enough for tonight in any case...
Pascal
So far I've got some more IDs working with these rules:
- payload xor = rx_tx_addr[0]^rx_tx_addr[1]^rx_tx_addr[2]
- hopping_frequency[0]=0x05+((rx_tx_addr[0]^rx_tx_addr[1]^rx_tx_addr[2]^rx_tx_addr[3])&0x0F);
- hopping_frequency[1]=0x20+hopping_frequency[0];
But there is something more like a check since for some values it doesn't bind at all, for others the hopping frequencies are wrong and others one of the frequency seems wrong.
Enough for tonight in any case...
Pascal
Last edit: 09 Apr 2019 22:04 by planger.
- goebish
-
- Offline
- NRF Weirdo
Less
More
- Posts: 2633
09 Apr 2019 23:04 #73753
by goebish
Replied by goebish on topic C-17 Transport
Test build for Devo 10:
www.dropbox.com/sh/s0xbf68hkfl5qni/AACNd...HdeIXBiQEXdF5Va?dl=0
Protocol GD00X, format V2
www.dropbox.com/sh/s0xbf68hkfl5qni/AACNd...HdeIXBiQEXdF5Va?dl=0
Protocol GD00X, format V2
- Moeder
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 796
10 Apr 2019 05:22 - 10 Apr 2019 05:23 #73757
by Moeder
Replied by Moeder on topic C-17 Transport
@Fer could you also install the attached build and follow the instructions from
this post
and post your results here? This could help us in get another address frequency pair to find out the pattern.
edit: you will need to run the scan with 250 kbps.
edit: you will need to run the scan with 250 kbps.
Last edit: 10 Apr 2019 05:23 by Moeder.
- Fer
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 203
10 Apr 2019 12:56 #73758
by Fer
Going to try it now one my spare DEVO 10. Haven't done this before, and i don't know if it will work, nor if this build is like the nightly builds. I hope i can come back soon with results.
Replied by Fer on topic C-17 Transport
Moeder wrote: @Fer could you also install the attached build and follow the instructions from this post and post your results here? This could help us in get another address frequency pair to find out the pattern.
edit: you will need to run the scan with 250 kbps.
Going to try it now one my spare DEVO 10. Haven't done this before, and i don't know if it will work, nor if this build is like the nightly builds. I hope i can come back soon with results.
- planger
-
Topic Author
- Offline
10 Apr 2019 13:27 #73759
by planger
Replied by planger on topic C-17 Transport
@Fer: have you tried the protocol GD00X, format V2?
- Fer
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 203
10 Apr 2019 13:47 #73760
by Fer
Replied by Fer on topic C-17 Transport
Ok, i installed the firmware from the link goebish provided, but in transmitter menu, only goes up to option 5. SCANER, i don't see a 6th option to sellect XNdump or whatever else should have appeared there. Have i done something wrong? Then i copyed again all files (including debug file) on the DEVO and now it is stuck on USB mode. Ahhhh... I am installing firmware again, and i hope to be able to fix it. Sorry, i am trying...
- goebish
-
- Offline
- NRF Weirdo
Less
More
- Posts: 2633
10 Apr 2019 13:48 #73761
by goebish
Replied by goebish on topic C-17 Transport
My build has the GD00X V2 protocol, the build Moeder posted has the XN297 scanner.
- goebish
-
- Offline
- NRF Weirdo
Less
More
- Posts: 2633
10 Apr 2019 13:52 #73762
by goebish
Replied by goebish on topic C-17 Transport
I just updated the test build in my dropbox folder, it now has GD00X V2 protocol and XN297 Dump.
www.dropbox.com/sh/s0xbf68hkfl5qni/AACNd...HdeIXBiQEXdF5Va?dl=0
www.dropbox.com/sh/s0xbf68hkfl5qni/AACNd...HdeIXBiQEXdF5Va?dl=0
- Fer
-
- Offline
Less
More
- Posts: 203
10 Apr 2019 13:57 #73763
by Fer
Ok, and i managed to get her back in order again. I am downloading this newest firmware, and installing it. Will report soon...
Replied by Fer on topic C-17 Transport
goebish wrote: I just updated the test build in my dropbox folder, it now has GD00X V2 protocol and XN297 Dump.
www.dropbox.com/sh/s0xbf68hkfl5qni/AACNd...HdeIXBiQEXdF5Va?dl=0
Ok, and i managed to get her back in order again. I am downloading this newest firmware, and installing it. Will report soon...
Time to create page: 0.199 seconds
-
Home
-
Forum
-
Development
-
Protocol Development
- C-17 Transport