publishing an intermediate release 3.1.0?

  • rbe2012
  • rbe2012's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • So much to do, so little time...
More
28 Nov 2013 13:50 - 28 Nov 2013 13:51 #15965 by rbe2012
Replied by rbe2012 on topic publishing an intermediate release 3.1.0?

PhracturedBlue wrote: I modified the printf code to add snprintf support based on this:
github.com/mludvig/mini-printf
It adds less than 100 bytes of code.
I think that using snprintf will negate most of the need for tr_n.

Looks like a suitable alternative. What about copyright? I have not found any hints.

EDIT: written before reading your last post.
Last edit: 28 Nov 2013 13:51 by rbe2012.
The topic has been locked.
More
28 Nov 2013 13:56 #15966 by PhracturedBlue
Replied by PhracturedBlue on topic publishing an intermediate release 3.1.0?
I didn't actually use the code, just the idea for it, so copyright isn't an issue.

Why didn't you replace dlgstr? it is the largest static string in the code, and I see no reason it can't be tempstring
The topic has been locked.
  • rbe2012
  • rbe2012's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • So much to do, so little time...
More
28 Nov 2013 14:34 #15968 by rbe2012
Replied by rbe2012 on topic publishing an intermediate release 3.1.0?
I don't remember for sure... I believe I spared this for later.
The topic has been locked.
More
28 Nov 2013 15:56 #15973 by PhracturedBlue
Replied by PhracturedBlue on topic publishing an intermediate release 3.1.0?
Ok, I've committed the last set of changes.
My repo should now have all the patches you have in 3.1
If you wouldn't mind getting rid of the TXID usage in pages/ that would help me out. Hopefully I didn't cause any regressions during the merge process.
The topic has been locked.
More
28 Nov 2013 16:13 #15976 by FDR
In the meantime I found an other little bug: the curve editor doesn't take the invertion of the source into account.
This is not because of the merge, it is probably there for long time already...
The topic has been locked.
More
28 Nov 2013 16:24 #15977 by PhracturedBlue
Replied by PhracturedBlue on topic publishing an intermediate release 3.1.0?
I'm not sure it should.
The curve editor is just defining a curve. The fact that the channel is inverted doesn't really have much to do with the defined curve.
So, we could change it if it is the right thing to do, but it isn't a bug and probably needs a bit of discussion.
The topic has been locked.
  • rbe2012
  • rbe2012's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • So much to do, so little time...
More
28 Nov 2013 16:41 #15979 by rbe2012
Replied by rbe2012 on topic publishing an intermediate release 3.1.0?
I think the cursor should move the other way - if normal, from (-100,f(-100)) to (100,f(100)); if inverted from (100,f(100)) to (-100,f(-100)), but the curve should look the same.
The topic has been locked.
More
28 Nov 2013 16:44 - 28 Nov 2013 16:45 #15982 by FDR
OK, just try to create the needed curve, when the source is inverted... ;)

But you are right, it doesn't apply the scale and offset either, so it will be different in the curve editor anyway...
Last edit: 28 Nov 2013 16:45 by FDR.
The topic has been locked.
More
28 Nov 2013 20:56 - 28 Nov 2013 20:56 #16000 by PhracturedBlue
Replied by PhracturedBlue on topic publishing an intermediate release 3.1.0?
Give my latest code a try.
I reversed the graph when the input is negated.
I also added the ability to select the nearest point when using touch to define a curve, so you don't need to 1st select a point and then its position.
Last edit: 28 Nov 2013 20:56 by PhracturedBlue.
The topic has been locked.
More
28 Nov 2013 21:13 #16003 by FDR
It's cool! :woohoo:

Finally I can draw the curve with dragging, at least in the emulator! ;)
The topic has been locked.
More
28 Nov 2013 21:18 #16004 by PhracturedBlue
Replied by PhracturedBlue on topic publishing an intermediate release 3.1.0?
I haven't pulled out my Tx yet, so I've only tested it in the emulator as well. I'm not sure how it'll work on a real Tx, but it is worth a try.
The topic has been locked.
More
29 Nov 2013 04:02 - 29 Nov 2013 04:16 #16014 by vlad_vy
Replied by vlad_vy on topic publishing an intermediate release 3.1.0?
What happened with values in emulator? All = 2f%.

Attachments:
Last edit: 29 Nov 2013 04:16 by vlad_vy.
The topic has been locked.
More
29 Nov 2013 04:14 #16015 by vlad_vy
Replied by vlad_vy on topic publishing an intermediate release 3.1.0?
PB, can you move strings at Simple mixer to the left, as at Complex mixer? Russian version of 'Src' string do not fit.



Attachments:
The topic has been locked.
More
29 Nov 2013 04:28 #16016 by PhracturedBlue
Replied by PhracturedBlue on topic publishing an intermediate release 3.1.0?
I had setup the emulator to use our internal sprintf implementation to get more thorough testing. But it doesn't support %f which is why you saw that.
I've fixed both the issues you mentioned.
The topic has been locked.
More
29 Nov 2013 04:50 #16017 by vlad_vy
Replied by vlad_vy on topic publishing an intermediate release 3.1.0?
Thanks, now all looks fine!
The topic has been locked.
More
29 Nov 2013 05:31 #16018 by richardclli
Replied by richardclli on topic publishing an intermediate release 3.1.0?
So the latest version in PB's repository is beta-5?
The topic has been locked.
More
29 Nov 2013 06:05 - 29 Nov 2013 06:06 #16019 by vlad_vy
Replied by vlad_vy on topic publishing an intermediate release 3.1.0?
Beta-15
Last edit: 29 Nov 2013 06:06 by vlad_vy.
The topic has been locked.
More
29 Nov 2013 10:55 - 29 Nov 2013 10:57 #16032 by blackmoon
Replied by blackmoon on topic publishing an intermediate release 3.1.0?
Looked on the nightlies page it was beta05

Then, just compiled and it still says deviation-devo7e-v3.1.0-beta-05-6f0119d.zip, not 15...

Typo ?
Last edit: 29 Nov 2013 10:57 by blackmoon.
The topic has been locked.
More
29 Nov 2013 12:20 #16033 by vlad_vy
Replied by vlad_vy on topic publishing an intermediate release 3.1.0?
I don't know why it is beta-05, but PB repository now include all RBE changes up to beta-15.
The topic has been locked.
  • rbe2012
  • rbe2012's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • So much to do, so little time...
More
29 Nov 2013 13:33 #16035 by rbe2012
Replied by rbe2012 on topic publishing an intermediate release 3.1.0?
PB has taken the first of my commits where I added these beta-tags but not all so numbering stops at -05 actually.
I would recommend tagging with beta-16 since there are some differences.
The topic has been locked.
Time to create page: 0.151 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum