×

Notice

The forum is in read only mode.
  1. Forum
  3. Development
  5. Protocol Development
  7. JD 395 cx-10

JD 395 cx-10

More
09 Oct 2015 13:18 - 09 Oct 2015 13:21 #38648 by goebish
Replied by goebish on topic JD 395 cx-10

IKKI wrote: Recording starts immediately and have no way to stop it.

Can you re-check with yesterday's test firmware to confirm video is on packet[14] bit 4 for JC3015-1 ?
Last edit: 09 Oct 2015 13:21 by goebish.
More
09 Oct 2015 13:23 #38649 by IKKI
Replied by IKKI on topic JD 395 cx-10
Hahahahahah .... EVERYTHING WORKS !!! I had done the first tests without a memory card inserted and the poor continued to flash to tell me I was missing! I always thought it would record. Now everything works. basically a channel makes the photo and the other records. I assigned commands. Ch7 run the photo, CH8 starts recording. So I assigned channels to SWA0 and SWA2 and I still SWB free! : D NICE and THANK YOU!
More
09 Oct 2015 13:25 #38650 by goebish
Replied by goebish on topic JD 395 cx-10
Thanks for reporting, please post your .ini in the appropriate sub-forum once you're happy with them :)
www.deviationtx.com/forum/model-configs
More
09 Oct 2015 13:43 #38652 by IKKI
Replied by IKKI on topic JD 395 cx-10
it's correct?
www.deviationtx.com/forum/model-configs/...ncheng-3015-1-3015-2
More
09 Oct 2015 13:53 #38654 by IKKI
Replied by IKKI on topic JD 395 cx-10
But as has already noticed someone missing several new protocols ... Since everything works you can do a Supercombo firmware? : P
Bayangtoys MJX and... H7?
More
09 Oct 2015 14:01 #38655 by vasiliy_gr
Replied by vasiliy_gr on topic JD 395 cx-10
Checked the new build on CX-10A (Blue), DM007 and 33041. Everything ok execept one issue with the 33041. And it is my mistake earlier... :)

I mean that works everything except RTH on 33041. Certainly it is not P13.4, but 0x0004 on P13 (as headless on DM007)... Sorry. So it should be P13.2. I mean this code:
        case FORMAT_MK33041:
            packet[13] |= GET_FLAG(CHANNEL_PICTURE, BV(7))
                    | GET_FLAG(CHANNEL_RTH, BV(2)); // not  | GET_FLAG(CHANNEL_RTH, BV(4));
            packet[14] = GET_FLAG(CHANNEL_VIDEO, BV(0))
                    | GET_FLAG(CHANNEL_HEADLESS, BV(5));
            break;
More
09 Oct 2015 14:05 #38656 by goebish
Replied by goebish on topic JD 395 cx-10
Ok, fix commited.
More
09 Oct 2015 14:12 #38657 by goebish
Replied by goebish on topic JD 395 cx-10

IKKI wrote: But as has already noticed someone missing several new protocols ... Since everything works you can do a Supercombo firmware? : P
Bayangtoys MJX and... H7?


That's not my responsibility to push the pull requests to default branch (from which the nightly is built) ;)
Regarding H7, I've put the pull request on hold because some people have reported my protocol works, but seems it's not the case for everyone ... (works fine with mine), could you check my test versions (from H7 & MT99xx threads) and report which one is working (or not) for you ?
More
09 Oct 2015 23:02 #38669 by hexfet
Replied by hexfet on topic JD 395 cx-10
I forgot to push the last Q282 changes that added support for V686g calibration before goebish pulled Q282. I've merged goebish's updates in my repo.

The protocol_combo test build is updated with the latest CX10 and MJQ, along with everything in default (Bayang and FY326 have been merged).
More
10 Oct 2015 08:04 #38680 by goebish
Replied by goebish on topic JD 395 cx-10
Wow, V686g is using a XN297 ?
This starts to be very confusing as the V686 is using a A7105 with a variant of the FlySky protocol :p
www.deviationtx.com/forum/protocol-devel...otocol-variant#29851
More
10 Oct 2015 08:46 #38683 by Durete
Replied by Durete on topic JD 395 cx-10
Yep, after some time selling the V686G with the fantastic A7105, they moved this model to XN297.
Damn manufacturers! :blink:
More
11 Oct 2015 06:02 #38726 by SeByDocKy
Replied by SeByDocKy on topic JD 395 cx-10

hexfet wrote: I forgot to push the last Q282 changes that added support for V686g calibration before goebish pulled Q282. I've merged goebish's updates in my repo.

The protocol_combo test build is updated with the latest CX10 and MJQ, along with everything in default (Bayang and FY326 have been merged).


Everything in your combo build ?
More
11 Oct 2015 06:04 - 11 Oct 2015 06:05 #38727 by SeByDocKy
Replied by SeByDocKy on topic JD 395 cx-10

goebish wrote: Wow, V686g is using a XN297 ?
This starts to be very confusing as the V686 is using a A7105 with a variant of the FlySky protocol :p
www.deviationtx.com/forum/protocol-devel...otocol-variant#29851


Actually all toys are XN297 based, probably cheaper .... but max output power is 12dBm (AFAIK, I didn't see any TX with a LNA+PA).
It means that all last toys have a very poor range except if we fly them with a Devo
Last edit: 11 Oct 2015 06:05 by SeByDocKy.
More
11 Oct 2015 12:03 #38733 by vasiliy_gr
Replied by vasiliy_gr on topic JD 395 cx-10

hexfet wrote: I forgot to push the last Q282 changes that added support for V686g calibration before goebish pulled Q282. I've merged goebish's updates in my repo.

The protocol_combo test build is updated with the latest CX10 and MJQ, along with everything in default (Bayang and FY326 have been merged).

I tested combo build on 33041 - now RTH works.
More
11 Oct 2015 12:47 #38737 by dc59
Replied by dc59 on topic JD 395 cx-10

vasiliy_gr wrote:

hexfet wrote: I forgot to push the last Q282 changes that added support for V686g calibration before goebish pulled Q282. I've merged goebish's updates in my repo.

The protocol_combo test build is updated with the latest CX10 and MJQ, along with everything in default (Bayang and FY326 have been merged).

I tested combo build on 33041 - now RTH works.


I got the same result on my MK33041, Headless & RTH worked fine!! :)
More
21 Nov 2015 17:16 #40274 by Edwin
Replied by Edwin on topic JD 395 cx-10
Hi all, I just made some spi captures of my cx10-c so the camera controls can maybe be added to the cx 10 protocol. I'll open a new thead with the captures.
More
21 Nov 2015 17:17 #40275 by goebish
Replied by goebish on topic JD 395 cx-10
that doesn't need a new thread, post them here please :)
More
19 Mar 2016 19:24 - 21 Mar 2016 13:15 #44836 by thecric
Replied by thecric on topic JD 395 cx-10
Hi guys,
will you do a deviated CX-10W ?
From theses pictures you can see a LT8910SSC 2.4G wireless module inside the transmitter.
Update: the picture above is from a FQ777-954 :whistle: !!!

It seems the CX-10W is able to use the CX-10C transmitter as seen in this video
which means it should be already deviated :ohmy:
Last edit: 21 Mar 2016 13:15 by thecric. Reason: New information about CX-10W
More
29 Mar 2016 09:40 #45374 by HighElf
Replied by HighElf on topic JD 395 cx-10
Guys, I've summarized all the available data for XN297 in the attached file.
Attachments:
More
29 Mar 2016 19:18 #45396 by victzh
Replied by victzh on topic JD 395 cx-10
No, it's not all available data :-) We know how its registers work, we know what it actually transmits over the air. This is much more important for its usage than various temperatures and dimensions.

But your document is very nicely done :-)
  1. Forum
  3. Development
  5. Protocol Development
  7. JD 395 cx-10
Time to create page: 0.674 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
Force desktop display